Dana Christensen
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Public Administration top 5%
- Co-authors
- Becky F. AntleAnita P. BarbeeRobert RosenthalDana J. SullivanBibhuti K. SarEli A. KaramAbraham WandersmanDoug Lombardi
- Topics
- Child Abuse and Trauma (6 papers)Child Welfare and Adoption (5 papers)Social Work Education and Practice (5 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Personality and Social PsychologyPersonality and Individual DifferencesChild Abuse & Neglect
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Dana Christensen
27 papers receiving 564 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Clinical Psychology 216
- Sociology and Political Science 176
- Social Psychology 149
- General Health Professions 143
- Public Administration 95
Countries citing papers authored by Dana Christensen
This map shows the geographic impact of Dana Christensen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dana Christensen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dana Christensen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dana Christensen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dana Christensen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dana Christensen. The network helps show where Dana Christensen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dana Christensen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dana Christensen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dana Christensen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dana Christensen. Dana Christensen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 15 | |
| 6 | 41 | |
| 7 | 36 | |
| 8 | 35 | |
| 9 | Risk quantification and risk management in renewable energy projects | 28 |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | The effects of training reinforcement on training transfer in child welfare. | 25 |
| 12 | 29 | |
| 13 | 38 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 19 | |
| 16 | Parents as Partners in Juvenile Corrections: Re-thinking Our Relationships with Families. | 1 |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | Family Therapy: Theory and Practice | 11 |
| 19 | 106 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About Dana Christensen
Dana Christensen is a scholar working on Public Administration, Computer Science Applications and Clinical Psychology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 598 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Abuse and Trauma (6 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (5 papers) and Social Work Education and Practice (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (95 citations), Safety Research (92 citations) and Clinical Psychology (216 citations). Dana Christensen has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Becky F. Antle, Anita P. Barbee, Robert Rosenthal, Dana J. Sullivan, Bibhuti K. Sar, Eli A. Karam, Abraham Wandersman, Doug Lombardi, Pedro R. Portes and Joseph H. Brown. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Personality and Individual Differences and Child Abuse & Neglect.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.