Dana Christensen

52 total papers · 777 total citations
28 papers, 594 citations indexed

About

Dana Christensen is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Dana Christensen has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 594 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Clinical Psychology, 5 papers in General Health Professions and 5 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Dana Christensen's work include Child Abuse and Trauma (6 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (5 papers) and Social Work Education and Practice (5 papers). Dana Christensen is often cited by papers focused on Child Abuse and Trauma (6 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (5 papers) and Social Work Education and Practice (5 papers). Dana Christensen collaborates with scholars based in United States. Dana Christensen's co-authors include Becky F. Antle, Anita P. Barbee, Robert Rosenthal, Dana J. Sullivan, Bibhuti K. Sar, Eli A. Karam, Abraham Wandersman, Pedro R. Portes, Doug Lombardi and Joseph H. Brown and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Personality and Individual Differences and Child Abuse & Neglect.

In The Last Decade

Dana Christensen

27 papers receiving 560 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Dana Christensen 216 176 148 142 95 28 594
Dean D. Knudsen 214 1.0× 353 2.0× 68 0.5× 97 0.7× 32 0.3× 38 698
Janice H. Schopler 169 0.8× 149 0.8× 89 0.6× 170 1.2× 78 0.8× 24 521
Iris Carlton-LaNey 126 0.6× 210 1.2× 54 0.4× 268 1.9× 218 2.3× 32 540
Philippa Williams 113 0.5× 350 2.0× 76 0.5× 175 1.2× 24 0.3× 29 685
Susan P. Robbins 143 0.7× 166 0.9× 53 0.4× 182 1.3× 157 1.7× 35 539
Catherine M. Lemieux 223 1.0× 158 0.9× 47 0.3× 124 0.9× 136 1.4× 40 606
Carol L. Langer 158 0.7× 281 1.6× 101 0.7× 160 1.1× 80 0.8× 21 680
Anita Franklin 209 1.0× 228 1.3× 30 0.2× 97 0.7× 28 0.3× 32 527
Mary Katherine O’Connor 69 0.3× 280 1.6× 34 0.2× 160 1.1× 130 1.4× 40 566
Diane S. Young 231 1.1× 305 1.7× 64 0.4× 222 1.6× 56 0.6× 26 582

Countries citing papers authored by Dana Christensen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dana Christensen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dana Christensen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dana Christensen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dana Christensen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dana Christensen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dana Christensen. The network helps show where Dana Christensen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dana Christensen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dana Christensen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dana Christensen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dana Christensen. Dana Christensen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026