Dan Ashlock

796 citations
36 papers · 460 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Dan Ashlock

35 papers receiving 440 citations

Peers

Dan Ashlock
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Safety Research 73
  • Management Science and Operations Research 93
  • Sociology and Political Science 191
  • Artificial Intelligence 125
  • Genetics 104
Replace Sevan G. Ficici with:
Sevan G. Ficici United States
Siang Yew Chong Malaysia
Zhao Song China
Ulrich Berger Austria
Dong Hao China
Shuyue Hu China
Zhenghong Deng China
Shaoting Tang China
Dan Ashlock relative to Sevan G. Ficici United States Sevan G. Ficici's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Sevan G. Ficici · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dan Ashlock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Ashlock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Ashlock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Ashlock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Ashlock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Ashlock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Ashlock. The network helps show where Dan Ashlock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dan Ashlock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dan Ashlock Line = papers co-authored together Dan Ashlock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199693
2 199985
3 200837
4
Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma with Choice and Refusal of Partners
199326
5 200423
6 200523
7 200520
8 200520
9 200319
10 200513
11 200211
12 200311
13 200611
14 200310
15 20009
16 20068
17 20105
18 20034
19 20024
20 20043

About Dan Ashlock

Dan Ashlock is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Sociology and Political Science, Molecular Biology, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 36 papers that have together received 460 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (9 papers), Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications (8 papers), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (5 papers), Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques (5 papers), Game Theory and Applications (4 papers), Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research (4 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (4 papers) and Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (73 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (93 citations), Sociology and Political Science (191 citations), Artificial Intelligence (125 citations) and Genetics (104 citations). Dan Ashlock has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and France. Frequent co-authors include Leigh Tesfatsion, E. Ann Stanley, C.W. Richter, G.B. Sheblé, Mark D. Smucker, N. Leahy, Stephen J. Willson, Jason Freeman, Sheridan Houghten and Tsui‐Jung Wen. Their work appears in journals such as Complexity, Computer applications in the biosciences, Physica D Nonlinear Phenomena, Biosystems and IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact