C.W. Richter

675 total citations
10 papers, 506 citations indexed

About

C.W. Richter is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Management Science and Operations Research and Computer Networks and Communications. According to data from OpenAlex, C.W. Richter has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 506 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 6 papers in Management Science and Operations Research and 1 paper in Computer Networks and Communications. Recurrent topics in C.W. Richter's work include Electric Power System Optimization (7 papers), Auction Theory and Applications (5 papers) and Smart Grid Energy Management (4 papers). C.W. Richter is often cited by papers focused on Electric Power System Optimization (7 papers), Auction Theory and Applications (5 papers) and Smart Grid Energy Management (4 papers). C.W. Richter collaborates with scholars based in United States and France. C.W. Richter's co-authors include G.B. Sheblé, Dan Ashlock, S.S. Venkata, R.D. Christie, D.W. Lane, Jayant Kumar, A. Petrov and Valentin Petrov and has published in prestigious journals such as IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery and Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University).

In The Last Decade

C.W. Richter

10 papers receiving 463 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
C.W. Richter United States	6	443	118	82	32	24	10	506
Konrad Purchała Belgium	9	516 1.2×	45 0.4×	81 1.0×	136 4.3×	15 0.6×	26	587
Víctor H. Hinojosa Chile	11	327 0.7×	47 0.4×	66 0.8×	48 1.5×	41 1.7×	34	357
Udi Helman United States	10	478 1.1×	52 0.4×	98 1.2×	65 2.0×	19 0.8×	16	526
Lester H. Fink United States	7	581 1.3×	30 0.3×	164 2.0×	195 6.1×	28 1.2×	9	661
Jeremy A. Bloom United States	11	347 0.8×	28 0.2×	169 2.1×	38 1.2×	5 0.2×	15	420
M. Innorta Italy	11	393 0.9×	44 0.4×	58 0.7×	143 4.5×	10 0.4×	35	459
F. Lacalandra Italy	8	460 1.0×	94 0.8×	72 0.9×	68 2.1×	8 0.3×	14	545
A. Delgadillo Spain	8	308 0.7×	23 0.2×	80 1.0×	152 4.8×	8 0.3×	21	432
Rui Pestana Portugal	10	271 0.6×	11 0.1×	42 0.5×	99 3.1×	40 1.7×	47	323
D. Sun United States	14	1.1k 2.4×	49 0.4×	203 2.5×	199 6.2×	8 0.3×	31	1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by C.W. Richter

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C.W. Richter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C.W. Richter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C.W. Richter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C.W. Richter

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C.W. Richter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C.W. Richter. The network helps show where C.W. Richter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C.W. Richter

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C.W. Richter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C.W. Richter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C.W. Richter. C.W. Richter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Petrov, A., Jayant Kumar, & C.W. Richter. (2005). An ISO market settlement design validation approach using probabilistic market simulation study techniques. 338–342. 2 indexed citations

2.

Venkata, S.S., et al.. (2005). Distribution System Reliability Assessment Due to Lightning Storms. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery. 20(3). 2153–2159. 70 indexed citations

3.

Richter, C.W., et al.. (2002). Price signal analysis for competitive electric generation companies. 66–71. 33 indexed citations

4.

Lane, D.W., C.W. Richter, & G.B. Sheblé. (2002). Modeling and evaluating electricity options markets with intelligent agents. 203–208. 13 indexed citations

5.

Richter, C.W., et al.. (2002). Improving market participant strategies with FTR options. 180–185. 3 indexed citations

6.

Petrov, Valentin, C.W. Richter, & G.B. Sheblé. (2002). Predatory gaming strategies for electric power markets. 488–492. 3 indexed citations

7.

Richter, C.W. & G.B. Sheblé. (2000). A profit-based unit commitment GA for the competitive environment. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. 15(2). 715–721. 146 indexed citations

8.

Richter, C.W., G.B. Sheblé, & Dan Ashlock. (1999). Comprehensive bidding strategies with genetic programming/finite state automata. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. 14(4). 1207–1212. 85 indexed citations

9.

Richter, C.W. & G.B. Sheblé. (1998). Genetic algorithm evolution of utility bidding strategies for the competitive marketplace. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. 13(1). 256–261. 148 indexed citations

10.

Richter, C.W.. (1996). Developing bidding strategies for electric utilities in a competitive environment. Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University). 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact