Dale C. Copeland
- Political Science and International Relations top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Development top 1%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance top 10%
- Co-authors
- John M. OwenN CalvertMargaret A. KnowlesVincent PouliotT. V. PaulJohn A. HallAmitav AcharyaStéfanie von Hlatky
- Topics
- International Relations and Foreign Policy (8 papers)Global Peace and Security Dynamics (4 papers)Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomMexico
In The Last Decade
Dale C. Copeland
18 papers receiving 564 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Political Science and International Relations 472
- Sociology and Political Science 343
- Development 175
- Economics and Econometrics 93
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 63
Countries citing papers authored by Dale C. Copeland
This map shows the geographic impact of Dale C. Copeland's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dale C. Copeland with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dale C. Copeland more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dale C. Copeland
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dale C. Copeland. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dale C. Copeland. The network helps show where Dale C. Copeland may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dale C. Copeland
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dale C. Copeland. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dale C. Copeland based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dale C. Copeland. Dale C. Copeland is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 23 | |
| 3 | 57 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 20 | |
| 7 | 25 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 41 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 87 | |
| 15 | 24 | |
| 16 | 17 | |
| 17 | 47 | |
| 18 | 25 | |
| 19 | 244 |
About Dale C. Copeland
Dale C. Copeland is a scholar working on Development, Political Science and International Relations and Communication, having authored 19 papers that have together received 652 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Relations and Foreign Policy (8 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (4 papers) and Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (175 citations), General Energy (28 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (472 citations). Dale C. Copeland has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include John M. Owen, N Calvert, Margaret A. Knowles, Vincent Pouliot, T. V. Paul, John A. Hall, Amitav Acharya, Stéfanie von Hlatky, Barry Buzan and John R. Oneal. Their work appears in journals such as Eurosurveillance, International Security and Review of International Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.