Daniel Flemes

1.2k total citations
50 papers, 653 citations indexed

About

Daniel Flemes is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Development and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel Flemes has authored 50 papers receiving a total of 653 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 38 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 27 papers in Development and 12 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Daniel Flemes's work include International Development and Aid (27 papers), International Relations in Latin America (21 papers) and International Relations and Foreign Policy (20 papers). Daniel Flemes is often cited by papers focused on International Development and Aid (27 papers), International Relations in Latin America (21 papers) and International Relations and Foreign Policy (20 papers). Daniel Flemes collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Brazil and Colombia. Daniel Flemes's co-authors include Leslie Wehner, Andrew F. Cooper, Thorsten Wojczewski, Guilherme Casarões, Steven E. Lobell, Detlef Nolte, Alcides Costa Vaz, Míriam Gomes Saraiva, Georg Strüver and Adam Habib and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Third World Quarterly and Bulletin of Latin American Research.

In The Last Decade

Daniel Flemes

44 papers receiving 579 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Daniel Flemes Germany 16 535 356 262 63 48 50 653
Detlef Nolte Germany 13 653 1.2× 282 0.8× 340 1.3× 54 0.9× 49 1.0× 71 777
Sean W. Burges Australia 14 522 1.0× 389 1.1× 242 0.9× 110 1.7× 44 0.9× 42 657
Dale C. Copeland United States 12 472 0.9× 175 0.5× 343 1.3× 93 1.5× 63 1.3× 19 652
Emizet F. Kisangani United States 11 284 0.5× 119 0.3× 391 1.5× 67 1.1× 27 0.6× 26 498
Leslie Wehner United Kingdom 14 458 0.9× 182 0.5× 269 1.0× 36 0.6× 17 0.4× 39 553
Michaela Mattes United States 13 500 0.9× 269 0.8× 589 2.2× 114 1.8× 47 1.0× 21 797
Jean‐Pierre Cabestan Hong Kong 12 226 0.4× 122 0.3× 191 0.7× 35 0.6× 35 0.7× 93 402
Gustavo A. Flores‐Macías United States 12 311 0.6× 121 0.3× 325 1.2× 130 2.1× 55 1.1× 26 555
Jürgen Haacke United Kingdom 13 476 0.9× 213 0.6× 324 1.2× 42 0.7× 61 1.3× 34 623
Paul K. MacDonald United States 12 298 0.6× 88 0.2× 226 0.9× 57 0.9× 20 0.4× 29 429

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Flemes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Flemes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Flemes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Flemes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Flemes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Flemes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Flemes. The network helps show where Daniel Flemes may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Flemes

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Flemes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Flemes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Flemes. Daniel Flemes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Casarões, Guilherme & Daniel Flemes. (2019). Brazil First, Climate Last: Bolsonaro's Foreign Policy. Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences). 5(5). 13. 18 indexed citations
2.
Flemes, Daniel, et al.. (2018). Rethinking Regional Leadership in the Global Disorder. Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences). 2(1). 7–23. 6 indexed citations
3.
Flemes, Daniel, et al.. (2017). Bound to Change: German Foreign Policy in the Networked Order. Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences). 1(1). 251–269.
4.
Flemes, Daniel, et al.. (2016). Neue deutsche Außenpolitik: Netzwerke statt Allianzen. Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences). 3(3). 10. 1 indexed citations
5.
Flemes, Daniel, et al.. (2015). Colombia y Brasil frente a la Alianza del Pacífico y el Mercosur. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2 indexed citations
6.
Flemes, Daniel, et al.. (2015). Special Issue: Regional Contestation to Rising Powers. 1 indexed citations
7.
Flemes, Daniel & Leslie Wehner. (2014). Drivers of strategic contestation: The case of South America. International Politics. 52(2). 163–177. 50 indexed citations
8.
Flemes, Daniel & Leslie Wehner. (2013). Reacciones estratégicas en Sudamérica ante el ascenso de Brasil. 13(4). 107–114. 5 indexed citations
9.
Flemes, Daniel & Leslie Wehner. (2012). Strategien südamerikanischer Sekundärmächte. Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences). 4(4). 8. 1 indexed citations
10.
Flemes, Daniel, et al.. (2012). Gobernanza multinivel de seguridad en América del Sur. Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México). 17(1). 203–238.
11.
Flemes, Daniel, et al.. (2011). Aufstieg der Netzwerkmächte. Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences). 2(2). 8. 2 indexed citations
12.
Flemes, Daniel & Thorsten Wojczewski. (2011). Contested Leadership in Comparative Perspective: Power Strategies in South Asia. 1 indexed citations
13.
Flemes, Daniel, et al.. (2010). Alianzas externas para armamento y defensa: Una nueva dimensión en la agenda de seguridad latinoamericana. 10(1). 22–33. 7 indexed citations
14.
Flemes, Daniel, et al.. (2010). Aufrüstung neuer Mächte : China, Indien, Brasilien und Iran. Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences). 1(1). 8. 1 indexed citations
15.
Flemes, Daniel & Detlef Nolte. (2009). Externe Rüstungs- und Militärallianzen : Eine neue Dimension in Lateinamerikas Sicherheitsagenda. Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences). 9(9). 8. 1 indexed citations
16.
Flemes, Daniel. (2008). Brasiliens neue Verteidigungspolitik: Vormachtsicherung durch Aufrüstung. Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences). 12(12). 8. 2 indexed citations
17.
Flemes, Daniel & Detlef Nolte. (2008). Zukünftige globale Machtverschiebungen: Die Debatte in den deutschen Thinktanks. Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences). 5(5). 8. 2 indexed citations
18.
Flemes, Daniel. (2007). Brasilien – Regionalmacht mit globalen Ambitionen. Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences). 6(6). 8. 6 indexed citations
19.
Flemes, Daniel. (2006). Urananreicherung im Hinterhof : Brasiliens Nuklearpolitik und die USA. Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences). 6(6). 8.
20.
Flemes, Daniel, et al.. (2005). Haiti: ein Jahr nach dem Sturz Aristides: leitet die UN-Stabilisierungsmission die Wende ein?. Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences). 5. 45–55. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026