Daiki Yamanaka
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine top 5%
- Developmental Neuroscience top 5%
- Neurology top 10%
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine top 10%
- Physiology
- Co-authors
- Masataka YokoyamaTakashi KawanoHiroki TateiwaFabricio M. LocatelliHideki IwataSatoru EguchiTadanori HamanoTsuyoshi Koyama
- Topics
- Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (8 papers)Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (8 papers)Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (5 papers)
- Cited by
- Developmental NeuroscienceCritical Care and Intensive Care MedicineAnesthesiology and Pain Medicine
- Journals
- NutrientsLife SciencesSpringerPlus
- Partner nations
- Japan
In The Last Decade
Daiki Yamanaka
23 papers receiving 319 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 119
- Developmental Neuroscience 102
- Neurology 76
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 54
- Physiology 53
Countries citing papers authored by Daiki Yamanaka
This map shows the geographic impact of Daiki Yamanaka's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daiki Yamanaka with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daiki Yamanaka more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daiki Yamanaka
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daiki Yamanaka. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daiki Yamanaka. The network helps show where Daiki Yamanaka may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daiki Yamanaka
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daiki Yamanaka. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daiki Yamanaka based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daiki Yamanaka. Daiki Yamanaka is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 18 | |
| 3 | 14 | |
| 4 | 29 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 34 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 14 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 17 | |
| 15 | 21 | |
| 16 | 12 | |
| 17 | 45 | |
| 18 | 13 | |
| 19 | 13 | |
| 20 | 10 |
About Daiki Yamanaka
Daiki Yamanaka is a scholar working on Developmental Neuroscience, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Neurology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 322 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (8 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (8 papers) and Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (102 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (119 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (54 citations). Daiki Yamanaka has collaborated with scholars based in Japan. Frequent co-authors include Masataka Yokoyama, Takashi Kawano, Hiroki Tateiwa, Fabricio M. Locatelli, Hideki Iwata, Satoru Eguchi, Tadanori Hamano, Tsuyoshi Koyama, Norimichi Shirafuji and Tatsuhiko Ito. Their work appears in journals such as Nutrients, Life Sciences and SpringerPlus.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.