Dahlia Mukherjee
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Co-authors
- Paul Crits‐ChristophMary Beth Connolly GibbonsJoseph W. KableErika F.H. SaundersTheodore D. SatterthwaiteAlexandre L. S. FilipowiczCaitlin E. MillettKhoi Vo
- Topics
- Mental Health Research Topics (10 papers)Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (9 papers)Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustriaMyanmar
In The Last Decade
Dahlia Mukherjee
25 papers receiving 434 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 176
- Clinical Psychology 161
- Psychiatry and Mental health 115
- Cognitive Neuroscience 104
- Social Psychology 77
Countries citing papers authored by Dahlia Mukherjee
This map shows the geographic impact of Dahlia Mukherjee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dahlia Mukherjee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dahlia Mukherjee more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dahlia Mukherjee
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dahlia Mukherjee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dahlia Mukherjee. The network helps show where Dahlia Mukherjee may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dahlia Mukherjee
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dahlia Mukherjee. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dahlia Mukherjee based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dahlia Mukherjee. Dahlia Mukherjee is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 46 | |
| 13 | 21 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 19 | |
| 17 | 23 | |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | 58 | |
| 20 | 33 |
About Dahlia Mukherjee
Dahlia Mukherjee is a scholar working on Biological Psychiatry, General Decision Sciences and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 444 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health Research Topics (10 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (9 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (47 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (176 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (43 citations). Dahlia Mukherjee has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Austria and Myanmar. Frequent co-authors include Paul Crits‐Christoph, Mary Beth Connolly Gibbons, Joseph W. Kable, Erika F.H. Saunders, Theodore D. Satterthwaite, Alexandre L. S. Filipowicz, Caitlin E. Millett, Khoi Vo, Venkatesh Krishnamurthy and Emma Mumper. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, Scientific Reports and Journal of Abnormal Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.