Nil Kaymaz

795 total citations
8 papers, 611 citations indexed

About

Nil Kaymaz is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology and Biological Psychiatry. According to data from OpenAlex, Nil Kaymaz has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 611 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 3 papers in Clinical Psychology and 2 papers in Biological Psychiatry. Recurrent topics in Nil Kaymaz's work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (5 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (2 papers) and Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (2 papers). Nil Kaymaz is often cited by papers focused on Schizophrenia research and treatment (5 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (2 papers) and Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (2 papers). Nil Kaymaz collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Germany. Nil Kaymaz's co-authors include Jim van Os, Roselind Lieb, Hans‐Ulrich Wïttchen, Marjan Drukker, M. Weiser, Nomi Werbeloff, Tineke Lataster, A.J.M. Loonen, Willem A. Nolen and Lydia Krabbendam and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Medicine, Journal of Affective Disorders and The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry.

In The Last Decade

Nil Kaymaz

8 papers receiving 596 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Nil Kaymaz Netherlands	7	416	203	188	125	104	8	611
M. Konings Netherlands	5	418 1.0×	239 1.2×	155 0.8×	125 1.0×	114 1.1×	8	634
Sidney Zisook United States	8	445 1.1×	185 0.9×	94 0.5×	154 1.2×	141 1.4×	15	614
Stanley Mutsatsa United Kingdom	9	466 1.1×	143 0.7×	80 0.4×	142 1.1×	128 1.2×	16	581
Lewis A. Opler United States	10	505 1.2×	280 1.4×	137 0.7×	112 0.9×	98 0.9×	13	734
Adanna Onyejiaka United Kingdom	12	604 1.5×	277 1.4×	148 0.8×	187 1.5×	93 0.9×	15	826
G. Reine France	13	694 1.7×	293 1.4×	195 1.0×	182 1.5×	111 1.1×	22	854
Jesús Ezcurra Spain	14	591 1.4×	219 1.1×	98 0.5×	114 0.9×	189 1.8×	20	770
Robert Faull United States	10	508 1.2×	215 1.1×	110 0.6×	200 1.6×	105 1.0×	12	691
B. Wiffen United Kingdom	14	443 1.1×	186 0.9×	114 0.6×	210 1.7×	79 0.8×	23	584
BG Schimmelmann Switzerland	7	691 1.7×	282 1.4×	110 0.6×	260 2.1×	68 0.7×	11	803

Countries citing papers authored by Nil Kaymaz

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nil Kaymaz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nil Kaymaz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nil Kaymaz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nil Kaymaz

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nil Kaymaz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nil Kaymaz. The network helps show where Nil Kaymaz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nil Kaymaz

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nil Kaymaz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nil Kaymaz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nil Kaymaz. Nil Kaymaz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Kaymaz, Nil, Marjan Drukker, Roselind Lieb, et al.. (2012). Do subthreshold psychotic experiences predict clinical outcomes in unselected non-help-seeking population-based samples? A systematic review and meta-analysis, enriched with new results. Psychological Medicine. 42(11). 2239–2253. 336 indexed citations

2.

Os, Jim van, Nil Kaymaz, Tineke Lataster, et al.. (2011). THE CASE OF THE MISSING EVIDENCE: DO PSYCHOTIC EXPERIENCES PREDICT CLINICAL OUTCOMES IN UNSELECTED POPULATION-BASED SAMPLES? A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS, ENRICHED WITH NEW RESULTS. Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics. 1 indexed citations

3.

Kaymaz, Nil & Jim van Os. (2010). Extended psychosis phenotype – yes: single continuum – unlikely. Psychological Medicine. 40(12). 1963–1966. 72 indexed citations

4.

Kaymaz, Nil & Jim van Os. (2010). DSM‐5 and the ‘Psychosis Risk Syndrome’: Babylonic confusion. Psychosis. 2(2). 100–103. 9 indexed citations

5.

Kaymaz, Nil & Jim van Os. (2009). Heritability of Structural Brain Traits. International review of neurobiology. 89. 85–130. 26 indexed citations

6.

Kaymaz, Nil, et al.. (2008). Evidence That Patients With Single Versus Recurrent Depressive Episodes Are Differentially Sensitive to Treatment Discontinuation. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 69(9). 1423–1436. 107 indexed citations

7.

Kaymaz, Nil, Lydia Krabbendam, Ron de Graaf, et al.. (2006). Evidence that the urban environment specifically impacts on the psychotic but not the affective dimension of bipolar disorder. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 41(9). 679–685. 30 indexed citations

8.

Kaymaz, Nil, Jim van Os, Ron de Graaf, et al.. (2006). The impact of subclinical psychosis on the transition from subclinicial mania to bipolar disorder. Journal of Affective Disorders. 98(1-2). 55–64. 30 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact