D. T. Mitchell

3.3k citations
74 papers · 2.5k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

D. T. Mitchell

73 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

D. T. Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 697
  • Plant Science 1.5k
  • Soil Science 288
  • Insect Science 318
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 462
Replace K. Haselwandter with:
K. Haselwandter Austria
Walter C. Shortle United States
Ursula Falkengren‐Grerup Sweden
Warwick B. Silvester New Zealand
Arthur E. Linkins United States
Amram Eshel Israel
Frank M. Thomas Germany
A. Gorissen Netherlands
Roberto Godoy Chile
Y. Waisel Israel
D. T. Mitchell relative to K. Haselwandter Austria K. Haselwandter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
K. Haselwandter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by D. T. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D. T. Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. T. Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. T. Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D. T. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. T. Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. T. Mitchell. The network helps show where D. T. Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside D. T. Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with D. T. Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together D. T. Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 74 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Environmental Phosphorus Handbook.
1973300
2 1983260
3 2012247
4 1985167
5 1987107
6 200177
7 200063
8 198759
9 198156
10 198456
11 198655
12 198649
13 198647
14 199639
15 198438
16 200636
17 200636
18 199331
19 201331
20 196831

About D. T. Mitchell

D. T. Mitchell is a scholar working on Plant Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Soil Science, having authored 74 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (39 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (15 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (11 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (9 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (9 papers), Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis (9 papers), Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (8 papers) and Plant and fungal interactions (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (697 citations), Plant Science (1.5k citations), Soil Science (288 citations), Insect Science (318 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (462 citations). D. T. Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, South Africa and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include J. U. M. Jarvis, Bruce Osborne, Edward J. Griffith, Alfred M. Beeton, E.T.F. Witkowski, Gary D. Bending, R.C. Cooke, Fiona M. Doohan, Christina Hazard and Paul Gosling. Their work appears in journals such as New Phytologist, Mycorrhiza, Journal of Ecology, Forest Pathology and Scientia Horticulturae.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact