Matthew Smuck
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 1%
- Surgery top 5%
- Pharmacology top 0.5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Co-authors
- David J. KennedyMing‐Chih KaoPatricia ZhengChristy Tomkins‐LaneCharles A. OdonkorNicolas SchmidtMichael A. SwiernikJonathan K. Wilt
- Topics
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (88 papers)Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (66 papers)Anesthesia and Pain Management (34 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Matthew Smuck
127 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.1k
- Surgery 1.0k
- Pharmacology 1.0k
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 209
- Biomedical Engineering 164
Countries citing papers authored by Matthew Smuck
This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew Smuck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew Smuck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew Smuck more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew Smuck
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew Smuck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew Smuck. The network helps show where Matthew Smuck may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthew Smuck
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthew Smuck. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthew Smuck based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matthew Smuck. Matthew Smuck is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 24 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 28 | |
| 9 | The emerging clinical role of wearables: factors for successful implementation in healthcarebreakdown → | 176 |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 70 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 53 | |
| 15 | 55 | |
| 16 | 13 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 67 | |
| 19 | 13 | |
| 20 | 12 |
About Matthew Smuck
Matthew Smuck is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pharmacology and Surgery, having authored 133 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (88 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (66 papers) and Anesthesia and Pain Management (34 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (1.1k citations), Pharmacology (1.0k citations) and Surgery (1.0k citations). Matthew Smuck has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include David J. Kennedy, Ming‐Chih Kao, Patricia Zheng, Christy Tomkins‐Lane, Charles A. Odonkor, Nicolas Schmidt, Michael A. Swiernik, Jonathan K. Wilt, Byron J. Schneider and Christopher T. Plastaras. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Spine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.