D. S. Malik

1.0k citations
44 papers · 641 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

D. S. Malik

41 papers receiving 574 citations

Peers

D. S. Malik
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Management Science and Operations Research 424
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 456
  • Algebra and Number Theory 77
  • Artificial Intelligence 257
  • Geometry and Topology 35
Replace T. S. Blyth with:
T. S. Blyth United Kingdom
Jörg H. Siekmann Germany
El-Sayed A. Abo-Tabl Egypt
Dimiter Vakarelov Bulgaria
Abd El Fattah El Atik Egypt
Évelyne Contejean France
Mostafa K. El-Bably Egypt
J. Richard Lundgren United States
Pablo Cordero Spain
D. S. Malik relative to T. S. Blyth United Kingdom T. S. Blyth's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
T. S. Blyth · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by D. S. Malik

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D. S. Malik's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. S. Malik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. S. Malik more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D. S. Malik

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. S. Malik. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. S. Malik. The network helps show where D. S. Malik may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside D. S. Malik, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with D. S. Malik Line = papers co-authored together D. S. Malik links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998145
2 199146
3 199434
4 199933
5 199726
6 199626
7
Fundamentals of Abstract Algebra
199625
8 199122
9 199022
10 200120
11 199219
12 199119
13 199018
14
FUZZY NORMAL SUBGROUPS IN FUZZY SUBGROUPS
199217
15
Java™ Programming: From Problem Analysis to Program Design
200517
16 199515
17 199214
18 199214
19 199113
20 199213

About D. S. Malik

D. S. Malik is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Management Science and Operations Research, Artificial Intelligence, Algebra and Number Theory and Clinical Psychology, having authored 44 papers that have together received 641 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Algebra and Logic (21 papers), Fuzzy and Soft Set Theory (18 papers), Fuzzy Logic and Control Systems (10 papers), Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic (6 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (5 papers), Multi-Criteria Decision Making (5 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (4 papers) and Rings, Modules, and Algebras (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (424 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (456 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (77 citations), Artificial Intelligence (257 citations) and Geometry and Topology (35 citations). D. S. Malik has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include John N. Mordeson, M. K. Sen, Premchand S. Nair, Sergio R. López-Permouth, Thomas H. Jobe, Shih-Chuan Cheng, Cathy M. Helgason, S. K. Jain, Kristin J. August and Charlotte N. Markey. Their work appears in journals such as Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Information Sciences, Body Image, Kybernetes and Journal of Health Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact