D. M. Coward
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 2%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 10%
- Co-authors
- E. J. HowellStephan UrwylerB. GendreR. R. BurmanD. G. BlairG. StrattaAssunta ImpératoM. Boër
- Topics
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (40 papers)Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (35 papers)Astro and Planetary Science (19 papers)
In The Last Decade
D. M. Coward
76 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 760
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 358
- Molecular Biology 246
- Psychiatry and Mental health 214
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 196
Countries citing papers authored by D. M. Coward
This map shows the geographic impact of D. M. Coward's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. M. Coward with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. M. Coward more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by D. M. Coward
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. M. Coward. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. M. Coward. The network helps show where D. M. Coward may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. M. Coward
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. M. Coward. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. M. Coward based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with D. M. Coward. D. M. Coward is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | PSN J06161835-2122329 a supernova candidate by Zadko in NGC 2207 | 0 |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | Research Informed Science Enrichment Programs at the Gravity Discovery Centre. | 2 |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | Some Observations and Analysis of Australian Space Debris | 1 |
| 11 | 27 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | Can Function Points be Mapped to Object Points | 3 |
| 15 | Host galaxy discrimination using world network of gravitational wave detectors | 1 |
| 16 | 28 | |
| 17 | 99 | |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | 39 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About D. M. Coward
D. M. Coward is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 80 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (40 papers), Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (35 papers) and Astro and Planetary Science (19 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (760 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (358 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (43 citations). D. M. Coward has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, France and Italy. Frequent co-authors include E. J. Howell, Stephan Urwyler, B. Gendre, R. R. Burman, D. G. Blair, G. Stratta, Assunta Impérato, M. Boër, P. D. Lasky and Vikram Ravi. Their work appears in journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and The British Journal of Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.