M. Laas–Bourez

422 total citations
19 papers, 233 citations indexed

About

M. Laas–Bourez is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, M. Laas–Bourez has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 233 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Aerospace Engineering, 8 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics and 8 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in M. Laas–Bourez's work include Advanced Frequency and Time Standards (8 papers), GNSS positioning and interference (6 papers) and Space Satellite Systems and Control (5 papers). M. Laas–Bourez is often cited by papers focused on Advanced Frequency and Time Standards (8 papers), GNSS positioning and interference (6 papers) and Space Satellite Systems and Control (5 papers). M. Laas–Bourez collaborates with scholars based in France, Australia and United Kingdom. M. Laas–Bourez's co-authors include Clément Courde, M. Boër, P. Exertier, A. Klotz, E. Samain, Pierre Uhrich, Daniele Rovera, Gwendoline Blanchet, D. M. Coward and Michel Abgrall and has published in prestigious journals such as IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific and Advances in Space Research.

In The Last Decade

M. Laas–Bourez

18 papers receiving 216 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
M. Laas–Bourez France 9 126 106 105 23 20 19 233
Philippe Guillemot France 9 171 1.4× 69 0.7× 55 0.5× 30 1.3× 26 1.3× 24 209
G. Maccaferri Italy 10 137 1.1× 70 0.7× 148 1.4× 70 3.0× 4 0.2× 31 305
F. Arias France 8 148 1.2× 64 0.6× 31 0.3× 10 0.4× 46 2.3× 11 188
Giancarlo Cerretto Italy 7 133 1.1× 126 1.2× 38 0.4× 11 0.5× 17 0.8× 41 172
Kensuke Kokado Japan 4 267 2.1× 46 0.4× 35 0.3× 24 1.0× 21 1.1× 15 333
C. Bortolotti Italy 9 147 1.2× 81 0.8× 109 1.0× 71 3.1× 5 0.3× 33 283
Y. Jafry Netherlands 8 35 0.3× 69 0.7× 103 1.0× 28 1.2× 9 0.5× 18 199
P. Worden United States 9 43 0.3× 38 0.4× 164 1.6× 13 0.6× 15 0.8× 28 253
P. W. McNamara United Kingdom 7 97 0.8× 39 0.4× 130 1.2× 30 1.3× 3 0.1× 18 220
Pierre Waller Netherlands 9 212 1.7× 144 1.4× 55 0.5× 58 2.5× 16 0.8× 29 254

Countries citing papers authored by M. Laas–Bourez

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Laas–Bourez's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Laas–Bourez with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Laas–Bourez more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Laas–Bourez

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Laas–Bourez. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Laas–Bourez. The network helps show where M. Laas–Bourez may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Laas–Bourez

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Laas–Bourez. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Laas–Bourez based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. Laas–Bourez. M. Laas–Bourez is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Rovera, Daniele, Michel Abgrall, Clément Courde, et al.. (2016). A direct comparison between two independently calibrated time transfer techniques: T2L2 and GPS Common-Views. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 723. 12037–12037. 4 indexed citations
2.
Laas–Bourez, M., Clément Courde, Étienne Samain, et al.. (2015). Accuracy validation of T2L2 time transfer in co-location. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control. 62(2). 255–265. 17 indexed citations
3.
Samain, E., et al.. (2015). Time transfer by laser link: a complete analysis of the uncertainty budget. Metrologia. 52(2). 423–432. 38 indexed citations
4.
Exertier, P., et al.. (2014). Time Transfer by Laser Link: Data analysis and validation to the ps level. Advances in Space Research. 54(11). 2371–2385. 30 indexed citations
5.
Rovera, Daniele, et al.. (2014). Link calibration against receiver calibration: an assessment of GPS time transfer uncertainties. Metrologia. 51(5). 476–490. 35 indexed citations
6.
Samain, E., M. Laas–Bourez, P. Exertier, et al.. (2014). A sub-ns comparison between GPS common view and T2L2. 46. 219–222. 4 indexed citations
7.
Rovera, Daniele, Michel Abgrall, Clément Courde, et al.. (2014). A direct comparison between two independently calibrated time transfer techniques: T2L2 and GPS common-views. 52. 666–667. 2 indexed citations
8.
Samain, Étienne, M. Laas–Bourez, Clément Courde, et al.. (2012). T2L2 : Ground to ground Time Transfer. 36–40. 3 indexed citations
9.
Gendre, B., G. Stratta, M. Laas–Bourez, et al.. (2011). The puzzling temporally variable optical and X-ray afterglow of GRB 101024A. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 3 indexed citations
10.
Coward, D. M., Grady Venville, M. Laas–Bourez, et al.. (2011). The Zadko telescope: A resource for science education enrichment. Advances in Space Research. 47(11). 1922–1930. 4 indexed citations
11.
Laas–Bourez, M., J. Kennewell, & D. M. Coward. (2011). Some Observations and Analysis of Australian Space Debris. UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia). 5–14. 1 indexed citations
12.
Laas–Bourez, M., et al.. (2011). First astrometric observations of space debris with the MéO telescope. Advances in Space Research. 49(3). 603–611. 7 indexed citations
13.
Coward, D. M., B. Gendre, P. J. Sutton, et al.. (2011). Towards an optimal search strategy of optical and gravitational wave emissions from binary neutron star coalescence. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Letters. 415(1). L26–L30. 12 indexed citations
14.
Laas–Bourez, M., D. M. Coward, A. Klotz, & M. Boër. (2010). A robotic telescope network for space debris identification and tracking. Advances in Space Research. 47(3). 402–410. 13 indexed citations
15.
Coward, D. M., M. Laas–Bourez, A. Klotz, et al.. (2010). The Zadko Telescope: A Southern Hemisphere Telescope for Optical Transient Searches, Multi-Messenger Astronomy and Education. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia. 27(3). 331–339. 15 indexed citations
16.
Laas–Bourez, M., et al.. (2009). A new algorithm for optical observations of space debris with the TAROT telescopes. Advances in Space Research. 44(11). 1270–1278. 26 indexed citations
17.
Laas–Bourez, M., et al.. (2009). Rapid Brightness Variations as a Tool to Enhance Satellite Detectability. 672. 31. 1 indexed citations
18.
Laas–Bourez, M., et al.. (2008). New algorithms for optical observations of space debris with the TAROT telescopes. cosp. 37. 1672. 1 indexed citations
19.
Boër, M., et al.. (2008). Robotic Observations of the Sky with TAROT: 2004–2007. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. 120(874). 1298–1306. 17 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026