D. J. Lewis
- Geometry and Topology top 2%
- Algebra and Number Theory top 5%
- Mathematical Physics top 5%
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 5%
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Co-authors
- H. DavenportV. N. FaddeevaD. K. FaddeevD. E. PrenticeC. GopinathKurt MahlerAllan J. SilbergerSamuel Pierre
- Topics
- Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (8 papers)History and Theory of Mathematics (7 papers)advanced mathematical theories (5 papers)
- Journals
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyAnnals of MathematicsAmerican Mathematical Monthly
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
D. J. Lewis
38 papers receiving 723 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
- Geometry and Topology 339
- Algebra and Number Theory 268
- Mathematical Physics 228
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 193
- Artificial Intelligence 134
Countries citing papers authored by D. J. Lewis
This map shows the geographic impact of D. J. Lewis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. J. Lewis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. J. Lewis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by D. J. Lewis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. J. Lewis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. J. Lewis. The network helps show where D. J. Lewis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. J. Lewis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. J. Lewis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. J. Lewis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with D. J. Lewis. D. J. Lewis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | Quotients of polynomials and a theorem of Pisot and Cantor | 1 |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 67 | |
| 7 | 37 | |
| 8 | 27 | |
| 9 | 188 | |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | 49 | |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | 38 | |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 9 | |
| 16 | 56 | |
| 17 | ρ-Adic Forms | 2 |
| 18 | 12 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 23 |
About D. J. Lewis
D. J. Lewis is a scholar working on Theoretical Computer Science, Geometry and Topology and Algebra and Number Theory, having authored 40 papers that have together received 887 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (8 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (7 papers) and advanced mathematical theories (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Algebra and Number Theory (268 citations), Geometry and Topology (339 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (31 citations). D. J. Lewis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include H. Davenport, V. N. Faddeeva, D. K. Faddeev, D. E. Prentice, C. Gopinath, Kurt Mahler, Allan J. Silberger, Samuel Pierre, Andrzej Schinzel and B. J. Birch. Their work appears in journals such as Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Annals of Mathematics and American Mathematical Monthly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.