D. F. Martin
- Insect Science top 1%
- Plant Science top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Genetics
- Co-authors
- M. J. LukefahrE. G. KingM. L. LasterS. D. PairH. M. GrahamC. M. IgnoffoAndrew ChapmanJ. R. Brazzel
- Topics
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (34 papers)Insect Resistance and Genetics (32 papers)Insect Pest Control Strategies (20 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesU.S. Virgin IslandsCzechia
In The Last Decade
D. F. Martin
60 papers receiving 491 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Insect Science 467
- Plant Science 260
- Molecular Biology 249
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 166
- Genetics 115
Countries citing papers authored by D. F. Martin
This map shows the geographic impact of D. F. Martin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. F. Martin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. F. Martin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by D. F. Martin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. F. Martin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. F. Martin. The network helps show where D. F. Martin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. F. Martin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. F. Martin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. F. Martin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with D. F. Martin. D. F. Martin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | A Computer Program For Simulating The Theoretical Suppression of The Tobacco Budworm By Genetic Sterilization | 1 |
| 2 | Algumas consequências da presença do bicudo-do-algodoeiro na região infestada de Campinas e Sorocaba, Estado de São Paulo, na safra 83/84 | 1 |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 23 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 0 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 0 |
About D. F. Martin
D. F. Martin is a scholar working on Insect Science, Plant Science and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 68 papers that have together received 626 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (34 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (32 papers) and Insect Pest Control Strategies (20 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (467 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (166 citations) and Plant Science (260 citations). D. F. Martin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, U.S. Virgin Islands and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include M. J. Lukefahr, E. G. King, M. L. Laster, S. D. Pair, H. M. Graham, C. M. Ignoffo, Andrew Chapman, J. R. Brazzel, John R. Meyer and Martin Jacobson. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Journal of Economic Entomology and Journal of Invertebrate Pathology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.