D. Danesh
- Plant Science top 2%
- Genetics
- Molecular Biology
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Physiology
- Co-authors
- Nevin D. YoungD. Menancio-HauteaChristian FatokunRoxanne DennyLalitha Sunil KumarJoann MudgePerry B. CreganEdward Fickus
- Topics
- Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis (7 papers)Agricultural pest management studies (6 papers)Genetic and Environmental Crop Studies (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesPhilippinesIndia
In The Last Decade
D. Danesh
25 papers receiving 930 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Plant Science 938
- Genetics 115
- Molecular Biology 105
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 44
- Physiology 41
Countries citing papers authored by D. Danesh
This map shows the geographic impact of D. Danesh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. Danesh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. Danesh more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by D. Danesh
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. Danesh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. Danesh. The network helps show where D. Danesh may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. Danesh
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. Danesh. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. Danesh based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with D. Danesh. D. Danesh is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 44 | |
| 5 | 53 | |
| 6 | 120 | |
| 7 | 48 | |
| 8 | 105 | |
| 9 | 90 | |
| 10 | 56 | |
| 11 | Incidence of four potato viruses in the Esfahan region of Iran. | 2 |
| 12 | 74 | |
| 13 | 152 | |
| 14 | RFLP technology, crop improvement, and international agriculture. | 3 |
| 15 | RFLP mapping in cowpea. | 4 |
| 16 | 11 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | Turnip mosaic virus in stock plant. | 2 |
| 19 | STORAGE RELATIVE HUMIDITY IN RAFSANJAN AND IMPOSSIBILITY OF PISTACHIO AFLATOXICOSIS AFTER NUT PROCESSING | 1 |
| 20 | Diseases of pulse crops (edible legumes) in Iran. | 29 |
About D. Danesh
D. Danesh is a scholar working on General Dentistry, Plant Science and Periodontics, having authored 27 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis (7 papers), Agricultural pest management studies (6 papers) and Genetic and Environmental Crop Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (938 citations), Horticulture (10 citations) and Endocrinology (26 citations). D. Danesh has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Philippines and India. Frequent co-authors include Nevin D. Young, D. Menancio-Hautea, Christian Fatokun, Roxanne Denny, Lalitha Sunil Kumar, Joann Mudge, Perry B. Cregan, Edward Fickus, Silvia Peñuela and Elwin L. Stewart. Their work appears in journals such as Genetics, Theoretical and Applied Genetics and Phytopathology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.