Multicolored Electrochromism in Polymers: Structures and Devices
- Journal
- Chemistry of Materials
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/cm049669l →Countries where authors are citing Multicolored Electrochromism in Polymers: Structures and Devices
This map shows the geographic impact of Multicolored Electrochromism in Polymers: Structures and Devices. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Multicolored Electrochromism in Polymers: Structures and Devices with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Multicolored Electrochromism in Polymers: Structures and Devices more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Multicolored Electrochromism in Polymers: Structures and Devices
This network shows the impact of Multicolored Electrochromism in Polymers: Structures and Devices. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Multicolored Electrochromism in Polymers: Structures and Devices.
About Multicolored Electrochromism in Polymers: Structures and Devices
This paper, published in 2004, received 708 indexed citations . Written by Avni A. Argun, Pierre‐Henri Aubert, Barry C. Thompson, Irina Schwendeman, Jungseek Hwang, Nicholas J. Pinto, D. B. Tanner, Alan G. MacDiarmid and John R. Reynolds covering the research area of Polymers and Plastics and Biomedical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Polymers and Plastics (626 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (396 citations) and Materials Chemistry (164 citations). Published in Chemistry of Materials.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/cm049669l.