Cynthia Wright

23 papers receiving 860 citations

Peers

Cynthia Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Rheumatology 163
  • Virology 38
  • Reproductive Medicine 40
  • Epidemiology 82
  • Neurology 16
Replace Brian J. Aneskievich with:
Brian J. Aneskievich United States
Brian P. Niland United States
J Brandt United States
Martina Bauer Germany
Hidetoshi Fujita Japan
Harald Illges Germany
Takayuki Shiratsuchi Japan
Louise H. Boyle United Kingdom
Elisabeth Kowenz‐Leutz Germany
Aibo Wang United States
Cynthia Wright relative to Brian J. Aneskievich United States Brian J. Aneskievich's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×
Brian J. Aneskievich · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cynthia Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cynthia Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cynthia Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cynthia Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cynthia Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cynthia Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cynthia Wright. The network helps show where Cynthia Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cynthia Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cynthia Wright Line = papers co-authored together Cynthia Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013202
2 2011117
3 2007100
4 200468
5 201266
6 200859
7 201138
8 201034
9 201133
10 202128
11 201124
12 201124
13 200920
14 201219
15 201318
16 201510
17 20238
18 20106
19
Comparative Quantitative Proteomic Profiling of Urine from Stone-Forming and Non-Stone Forming Patients to Identify Candidate Regulators of Urolithiasis
20102
20
Discovery of candidate serum proteomic and metabolomic biomarkers in ankylosing spondylitis
20122

About Cynthia Wright

Cynthia Wright is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Virology, Rheumatology, Oncology and Pharmacology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 882 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments (4 papers), HIV Research and Treatment (3 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (3 papers), Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments (2 papers), Polyomavirus and related diseases (1 paper), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (1 paper), Autophagy in Disease and Therapy (1 paper) and Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Rheumatology (163 citations), Virology (38 citations), Reproductive Medicine (40 citations), Epidemiology (82 citations) and Neurology (16 citations). Cynthia Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Benedikt Mathias Kessler, Paul Bowness, David C. Trudgian, Román Fischer, Simon Kollnberger, Sebastian Springer, Martin Zacharias, Holger Kramer, Patrycja Kozik and Andrew James McMichael. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, British Journal of General Practice, European Journal of Immunology, Retrovirology and Nature Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact