Sarah Howles

1.8k total citations
34 papers, 950 citations indexed

About

Sarah Howles is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Nephrology and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Sarah Howles has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 950 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, 13 papers in Nephrology and 8 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Sarah Howles's work include Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments (16 papers), Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments (9 papers) and Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies (8 papers). Sarah Howles is often cited by papers focused on Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments (16 papers), Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments (9 papers) and Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies (8 papers). Sarah Howles collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Israel. Sarah Howles's co-authors include Rajesh V. Thakker, Fadil Hannan, M. Andrew Nesbit, Nigel Rust, Treena Cranston, Valerie Babinsky, Rosie Head, Maurine R. Hobbs, Hunter Heath and Benjamin W. Turney and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Journal of Clinical Investigation.

In The Last Decade

Sarah Howles

31 papers receiving 933 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sarah Howles United Kingdom 13 433 313 309 154 140 34 950
Harley R. Powell Australia 14 517 1.2× 253 0.8× 215 0.7× 123 0.8× 108 0.8× 27 984
Mariko Hida Japan 14 181 0.4× 440 1.4× 108 0.3× 110 0.7× 160 1.1× 41 834
Yoshiharu Muto Japan 15 233 0.5× 492 1.6× 118 0.4× 53 0.3× 90 0.6× 42 917
Malu Zandbergen Netherlands 16 372 0.9× 200 0.6× 127 0.4× 86 0.6× 109 0.8× 22 905
Maddalena Gigante Italy 18 345 0.8× 308 1.0× 165 0.5× 23 0.1× 77 0.6× 44 938
Roberto Gastaldi Italy 24 98 0.2× 542 1.7× 189 0.6× 148 1.0× 313 2.2× 73 1.7k
Omar H. Maarouf United States 17 248 0.6× 617 2.0× 150 0.5× 40 0.3× 92 0.7× 24 1.2k
Leonardo Vicentini Italy 23 297 0.7× 496 1.6× 84 0.3× 89 0.6× 345 2.5× 52 1.6k
Claudia Izzi Italy 19 311 0.7× 565 1.8× 204 0.7× 536 3.5× 341 2.4× 52 1.3k
George B.M. Lindop United Kingdom 21 173 0.4× 474 1.5× 339 1.1× 205 1.3× 163 1.2× 77 1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Howles

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Howles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Howles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Howles more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Howles

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Howles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Howles. The network helps show where Sarah Howles may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Howles

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Howles. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Howles based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Howles. Sarah Howles is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Howles, Sarah, et al.. (2025). Patients’ priorities in kidney stone disease. Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England. 108(3). 214–220.
2.
Bargagli, Matteo, et al.. (2025). Kidney stone disease: risk factors, pathophysiology and management. Nature Reviews Nephrology. 21(11). 794–808. 2 indexed citations
3.
Lovegrove, Catherine, Michelle Goldsworthy, Jeremy S. Haley, et al.. (2025). Genetic variants predisposing to an increased risk of kidney stone disease. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 135(15). 2 indexed citations
4.
Geraghty, Robert, Catherine Lovegrove, Sarah Howles, & John A. Sayer. (2024). Role of Genetic Testing in Kidney Stone Disease: A Narrative Review. Current Urology Reports. 25(12). 311–323. 5 indexed citations
5.
Lovegrove, Catherine, Sarah Howles, Dominic Furniss, & Michael V. Holmes. (2024). Causal inference in health and disease: a review of the principles and applications of Mendelian randomization. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 39(11). 1539–1552. 11 indexed citations
6.
Ang, Andrew, et al.. (2024). Urology never events in the United Kingdom: A retrospective 10‐year review. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 5(5). 547–551. 1 indexed citations
9.
Lovegrove, Catherine, Jelena Bešević, Akira Wiberg, et al.. (2023). Central Adiposity Increases Risk of Kidney Stone Disease through Effects on Serum Calcium Concentrations. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 34(12). 1991–2011. 22 indexed citations
10.
Miah, Saiful, et al.. (2023). Pregnancy and parenthood in surgical training: a cross-sectional survey in the UK. British journal of surgery. 110(12). 1628–1631. 6 indexed citations
11.
Byrne, Matthew H V, Fanourios Georgiades, Alexander Light, et al.. (2022). Impact of COVID ‐19 on the management and outcomes of ureteric stones in the UK : a multicentre retrospective study. British Journal of Urology. 131(1). 82–89. 7 indexed citations
12.
Lovegrove, Catherine, et al.. (2021). Natural history of small asymptomatic kidney and residual stones over a long‐term follow‐up: systematic review over 25 years. British Journal of Urology. 129(4). 442–456. 24 indexed citations
13.
Howles, Sarah & Rajesh V. Thakker. (2020). Genetics of kidney stone disease. Nature Reviews Urology. 17(7). 407–421. 125 indexed citations
14.
Howles, Sarah, Caroline M. Gorvin, Treena Cranston, et al.. (2020). GNA11 Variants Identified in Patients with Hypercalcemia or Hypocalcemia. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 38(6). 907–917. 8 indexed citations
15.
Howles, Sarah, Akira Wiberg, Michelle Goldsworthy, et al.. (2019). Genetic variants of calcium and vitamin D metabolism in kidney stone disease. Nature Communications. 10(1). 5175–5175. 85 indexed citations
16.
Howles, Sarah, Fadil Hannan, Caroline M. Gorvin, et al.. (2017). Cinacalcet corrects hypercalcemia in mice with an inactivating Gα11 mutation. JCI Insight. 2(20). 12 indexed citations
17.
Gorvin, Caroline M., Fadil Hannan, Sarah Howles, et al.. (2017). Gα11 mutation in mice causes hypocalcemia rectifiable by calcilytic therapy. JCI Insight. 2(3). e91103–e91103. 55 indexed citations
18.
Nesbit, M. Andrew, Fadil Hannan, Sarah Howles, et al.. (2013). Mutations Affecting G-Protein Subunit α11in Hypercalcemia and Hypocalcemia. New England Journal of Medicine. 368(26). 2476–2486. 240 indexed citations
19.
Wright, Cynthia, Sarah Howles, David C. Trudgian, et al.. (2011). Label-free Quantitative Proteomics Reveals Differentially Regulated Proteins Influencing Urolithiasis. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. 10(8). M110.005686–M110.005686. 33 indexed citations
20.
Howles, Sarah, Jonathan L. Curry, Ian J. McKay, John Reynard, & Alison F. Brading. (2009). Lack of effectiveness of botulinum neurotoxin A on isolated detrusor strips and whole bladders from mice and guinea‐pigs in vitro. British Journal of Urology. 104(10). 1524–1530. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026