Curtis R. Youngs
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Genetics top 10%
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 5%
- Reproductive Medicine top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Stephen P. FordLynda K. McGinnisMatthew E. WilsonNina J. BiensenZae Young RyooJ. N. CaamañoLane K. ChristensonL.H. Anderson
- Topics
- Reproductive Biology and Fertility (28 papers)Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (20 papers)Sperm and Testicular Function (13 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAlgeriaPeru
In The Last Decade
Curtis R. Youngs
55 papers receiving 699 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 350
- Genetics 229
- Agronomy and Crop Science 222
- Reproductive Medicine 197
- Molecular Biology 164
Countries citing papers authored by Curtis R. Youngs
This map shows the geographic impact of Curtis R. Youngs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Curtis R. Youngs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Curtis R. Youngs more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Curtis R. Youngs
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Curtis R. Youngs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Curtis R. Youngs. The network helps show where Curtis R. Youngs may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Curtis R. Youngs
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Curtis R. Youngs. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Curtis R. Youngs based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Curtis R. Youngs. Curtis R. Youngs is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 21 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 32 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | The Use of a Vaginal Conductivity Probe to Influence Calf Sex Ratio via Altered Insemination Time | 1 |
| 14 | 35 | |
| 15 | 114 | |
| 16 | 49 | |
| 17 | 31 | |
| 18 | 17 | |
| 19 | 56 | |
| 20 | 14 |
About Curtis R. Youngs
Curtis R. Youngs is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Reproductive Medicine and Equine, having authored 59 papers that have together received 728 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Biology and Fertility (28 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (20 papers) and Sperm and Testicular Function (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (197 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (222 citations) and Small Animals (93 citations). Curtis R. Youngs has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Algeria and Peru. Frequent co-authors include Stephen P. Ford, Lynda K. McGinnis, Matthew E. Wilson, Nina J. Biensen, Zae Young Ryoo, J. N. Caamaño, Lane K. Christenson, L.H. Anderson, R.A. Godke and Rocío Melissa Rivera. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Dairy Science, Frontiers in Microbiology and Biology of Reproduction.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.