Craig Wilde

558 citations
36 papers · 320 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

    • Retinal Diseases and Treatments 19
    • Glaucoma and retinal disorders 13
    • Retinal and Optic Conditions 6
    • Intraocular Surgery and Lenses 5
    • Retinal Imaging and Analysis 11
    • Retinal and Macular Surgery 7
    • Corneal surgery and disorders 5
    • Corneal Surgery and Treatments 4

Craig Wilde

31 papers receiving 311 citations

Peers

Craig Wilde
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Ophthalmology 258
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 212
  • Medical Terminology 1
  • Microbiology 1
  • Epidemiology 46
Replace Nuno Moura‐Coelho with:
Nuno Moura‐Coelho Portugal
Itika Garg United States
Mengyuan Ke Singapore
Zi Jin China
Denise Descovich Canada
Ambika Hoguet United States
João Beato Portugal
Carl Park United States
Hannah J. Yu United States
Manish Panday India
Craig Wilde relative to Nuno Moura‐Coelho Portugal Nuno Moura‐Coelho's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.8×
Nuno Moura‐Coelho · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Craig Wilde

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Craig Wilde's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Craig Wilde with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Craig Wilde more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Craig Wilde

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Craig Wilde. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Craig Wilde. The network helps show where Craig Wilde may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Craig Wilde, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Craig Wilde Line = papers co-authored together Craig Wilde links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201547
2 201740
3 201637
4 202330
5 201928
6 201517
7 201713
8 201613
9 202111
10 201811
11 201711
12 20208
13 20177
14 20176
15 20206
16 20186
17 20185
18 20185
19 20104
20 20232

About Craig Wilde

Craig Wilde is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Epidemiology, Neurology and Surgery, having authored 36 papers that have together received 320 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (19 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (13 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (11 papers), Retinal and Macular Surgery (7 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (6 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (5 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (5 papers) and Corneal Surgery and Treatments (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (258 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (212 citations), Medical Terminology (1 citation), Microbiology (1 citation) and Epidemiology (46 citations). Craig Wilde has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and United States. Frequent co-authors include Winfried M. K. Amoaku, Ali Poostchi, M. Patel, Martin Rubinstein, Paolo Giuseppe Limoli, S A Vernon, Marco Messina, Rajnikant Mehta, Harminder S. Dua and Georgios D. Panos. Their work appears in journals such as Eye, European Journal of Ophthalmology, Journal of Clinical Medicine, Ophthalmology Retina and The Ocular Surface.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact