Cornelius K. Donat
- Molecular Biology
- Neurology top 5%
- Neurology top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Epidemiology
- Co-authors
- Magdalena SastreSteve GentlemanGregory ScottPeter BrustPaul EdisonWinnie Deuther‐ConradK NieberCornelia Voigt
- Topics
- Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (10 papers)Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (10 papers)Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (8 papers)
- Cited by
- NeurologyBiological Psychiatry
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaBrainScientific Reports
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Cornelius K. Donat
43 papers receiving 972 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Molecular Biology 384
- Neurology 301
- Neurology 280
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 171
- Epidemiology 157
Countries citing papers authored by Cornelius K. Donat
This map shows the geographic impact of Cornelius K. Donat's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cornelius K. Donat with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cornelius K. Donat more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cornelius K. Donat
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cornelius K. Donat. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cornelius K. Donat. The network helps show where Cornelius K. Donat may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cornelius K. Donat
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cornelius K. Donat. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cornelius K. Donat based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cornelius K. Donat. Cornelius K. Donat is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 67 | |
| 10 | 335 | |
| 11 | 15 | |
| 12 | 20 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 21 | |
| 15 | 14 | |
| 16 | 12 | |
| 17 | 10 | |
| 18 | 24 | |
| 19 | 10 | |
| 20 | 28 |
About Cornelius K. Donat
Cornelius K. Donat is a scholar working on Neurology, Neurology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 46 papers that have together received 979 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (10 papers), Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (10 papers) and Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (301 citations), Neurology (280 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (45 citations). Cornelius K. Donat has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Magdalena Sastre, Steve Gentleman, Gregory Scott, Peter Brust, Paul Edison, Winnie Deuther‐Conrad, K Nieber, Cornelia Voigt, Martin U. Schuhmann and Steffen Fischer. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Brain and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.