Huma Sethi

1.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
14 papers, 833 citations indexed

About

Huma Sethi is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Neurology and Neurology. According to data from OpenAlex, Huma Sethi has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 833 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 6 papers in Neurology and 4 papers in Neurology. Recurrent topics in Huma Sethi's work include Barrier Structure and Function Studies (4 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (4 papers) and Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (4 papers). Huma Sethi is often cited by papers focused on Barrier Structure and Function Studies (4 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (4 papers) and Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (4 papers). Huma Sethi collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Thailand. Huma Sethi's co-authors include David Attwell, Nils Korte, Ross Nortley, Chanawee Hirunpattarasilp, Jinping Cheng, Yamei Tang, Thomas Pfeiffer, Sebastian Brandner, Takaomi C. Saido and Hui Gong and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Nature Neuroscience.

In The Last Decade

Huma Sethi

13 papers receiving 822 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Amyloid β oligomers constrict human capillaries in Alzheimer’s disease via signaling to pericytes

2019 475 citations Ross Nortley, Nils Korte et al. Science profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Huma Sethi United Kingdom	9	350	283	209	181	174	14	833
Lila Khennouf Denmark	5	349 1.0×	276 1.0×	178 0.9×	148 0.8×	127 0.7×	5	738
Divna Lazić Serbia	10	554 1.6×	267 0.9×	274 1.3×	139 0.8×	182 1.0×	17	1.0k
Ross Nortley United Kingdom	7	451 1.3×	386 1.4×	242 1.2×	185 1.0×	150 0.9×	13	1.0k
Chanawee Hirunpattarasilp United Kingdom	7	295 0.8×	250 0.9×	158 0.8×	106 0.6×	101 0.6×	9	618
Lingzhi Zhao United States	11	428 1.2×	520 1.8×	260 1.2×	321 1.8×	178 1.0×	12	1.1k
Nils Korte United Kingdom	10	486 1.4×	407 1.4×	255 1.2×	168 0.9×	153 0.9×	12	1.1k
Kelly Ceyzériat Switzerland	14	415 1.2×	349 1.2×	261 1.2×	170 0.9×	71 0.4×	33	893
Miriam Ries United Kingdom	8	335 1.0×	417 1.5×	218 1.0×	299 1.7×	161 0.9×	8	871
Patrick Schweder New Zealand	17	376 1.1×	138 0.5×	246 1.2×	161 0.9×	327 1.9×	45	1.1k
Anita Ramanathan United States	6	289 0.8×	171 0.6×	213 1.0×	90 0.5×	112 0.6×	6	692

Countries citing papers authored by Huma Sethi

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Huma Sethi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Huma Sethi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Huma Sethi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Huma Sethi

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Huma Sethi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Huma Sethi. The network helps show where Huma Sethi may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Huma Sethi

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Huma Sethi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Huma Sethi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Huma Sethi. Huma Sethi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

14 of 14 papers shown

Korte, Nils, Anna Barkaway, Jack A. Wells, et al.. (2024). Inhibiting Ca2+ channels in Alzheimer’s disease model mice relaxes pericytes, improves cerebral blood flow and reduces immune cell stalling and hypoxia. Nature Neuroscience. 27(11). 2086–2100. 18 indexed citations

Kitchen, Neil, Andrew W. McEvoy, Anna Miserocchi, et al.. (2023). Safety and efficacy of brain biopsy: Results from a single institution retrospective cohort study. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3. 101763–101763. 7 indexed citations

Korte, Nils, Greg James, Chanawee Hirunpattarasilp, et al.. (2023). Noradrenaline released from locus coeruleus axons contracts cerebral capillary pericytes via α₂ adrenergic receptors. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism. 43(7). 1142–1152. 29 indexed citations

Neueder, Andreas, Kerstin Kojer, Daniel J. Lavery, et al.. (2022). Abnormal molecular signatures of inflammation, energy metabolism, and vesicle biology in human Huntington disease peripheral tissues. Genome biology. 23(1). 189–189. 10 indexed citations

Hirunpattarasilp, Chanawee, Greg James, Felipe Freitas, et al.. (2022). SARS-CoV-2 triggers pericyte-mediated cerebral capillary constriction. Brain. 146(2). 727–738. 28 indexed citations

Hirunpattarasilp, Chanawee, Anna Barkaway, Harvey Davis, et al.. (2022). Hyperoxia evokes pericyte-mediated capillary constriction. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism. 42(11). 2032–2047. 16 indexed citations

Sethi, Huma & Seema Mehta. (2020). DRIVERS OF CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT AND ITS EFFECT ON SATISFACTION: AN INTERNATIONAL PATIENT'S PERSPECTIVE OF INDIAN HOSPITAL. 9(2). 64–81.

Nortley, Ross, Nils Korte, Pablo Izquierdo, et al.. (2019). Amyloid β oligomers constrict human capillaries in Alzheimer’s disease via signaling to pericytes. Science. 365(6450). 475 indexed citations breakdown →

Cheng, Jinping, Nils Korte, Ross Nortley, et al.. (2018). Targeting pericytes for therapeutic approaches to neurological disorders. Acta Neuropathologica. 136(4). 507–523. 183 indexed citations

10.

Parker, Jennifer K., Edina Silajdžić, Salman Haider, et al.. (2015). Analysis of White Adipose Tissue Gene Expression Reveals CREB1 Pathway Altered in Huntington’s Disease. Journal of Huntington s Disease. 4(4). 371–382. 10 indexed citations

11.

Smith, James D., et al.. (2014). An investigation into the clinical impacts of lowering shunt opening pressure in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: A case series. British Journal of Neurosurgery. 29(1). 18–22. 5 indexed citations

12.

Kirkman, Matthew A., Laurence Watkins, Neil Kitchen, & Huma Sethi. (2013). Early years neurosurgical training in the era of the European Working Time Directive. British Journal of Neurosurgery. 27(5). 586–589. 7 indexed citations

13.

Stuart, Sam, Brynmor Jones, Kshitij Mankad, Huma Sethi, & Indran Davagnanam. (2010). Migrating tumour of the cauda equina. Postgraduate Medical Journal. 86(1015). 313–313. 3 indexed citations

14.

Sethi, Huma, et al.. (2000). Hydrocephalus: comparison of clipping and embolization in aneuryson treatment. Journal of neurosurgery. 92(6). 991–994. 42 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact