Cornelia Daheim

416 citations
9 papers · 257 indexed · h-index 6

Cornelia Daheim

9 papers receiving 226 citations

Peers

Cornelia Daheim
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Strategy and Management 88
  • Management Science and Operations Research 71
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 36
  • Fuel Technology 2
  • Business and International Management 5
Replace Jean‐Philippe Bootz with:
Jean‐Philippe Bootz France
Zdenka Ženko Slovenia
Jennifer Cassingena Harper United Kingdom
Elisabetta Marinelli United Kingdom
Vincent Boly France
Esther Ferrándiz Spain
A. O. Lewis United States
Remì Barrè France
Susan C. Morton United Kingdom
Roxanne Helm-Stevens United States
Cornelia Daheim relative to Jean‐Philippe Bootz France Jean‐Philippe Bootz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Jean‐Philippe Bootz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cornelia Daheim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cornelia Daheim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cornelia Daheim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cornelia Daheim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cornelia Daheim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cornelia Daheim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cornelia Daheim. The network helps show where Cornelia Daheim may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Cornelia Daheim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cornelia Daheim Line = papers co-authored together Cornelia Daheim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 201743
2 201631
3 20165
4 20163
5
Emerging practices in foresight and their use in STI policy
20151
6
The Future of Work Jobs and Skills in 2030
201436
7 201322
8 20121
9 2008115

About Cornelia Daheim

Cornelia Daheim is a scholar working on Business and International Management, Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management, Media Technology and Management Information Systems, having authored 9 papers that have together received 257 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Regional resilience and development (2 papers), Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (2 papers), Economic and Technological Innovation (1 paper), Big Data and Business Intelligence (1 paper), Complex Systems and Decision Making (1 paper), Smart Cities and Technologies (1 paper), Innovation and Socioeconomic Development (1 paper) and Competitive and Knowledge Intelligence (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Strategy and Management (88 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (71 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (36 citations), Fuel Technology (2 citations) and Business and International Management (5 citations). Cornelia Daheim has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Poland and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Eckhard Störmer, Andy Hines, Martin Rhisiart, Sven Hirsch, Kerstin Cuhls and Gualtiero Fantoni. Their work appears in journals such as Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, Futures, foresight, European Journal of Futures Research and Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026