A. O. Lewis
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Management Information Systems
- Management of Technology and Innovation top 10%
- Topics
- Innovation and Knowledge Management (2 papers)Economic and Technological Innovation (1 paper)Complex Systems and Decision Making (1 paper)
- Cited by
- Strategy and ManagementManagement of Technology and InnovationManagement Information Systems
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of Management ResearchUMI eBooks
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
A. O. Lewis
7 papers receiving 211 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Strategy and Management 94
- Economics and Econometrics 46
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 34
- Management Information Systems 33
- Management of Technology and Innovation 27
Countries citing papers authored by A. O. Lewis
This map shows the geographic impact of A. O. Lewis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. O. Lewis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. O. Lewis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by A. O. Lewis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. O. Lewis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. O. Lewis. The network helps show where A. O. Lewis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. O. Lewis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. O. Lewis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. O. Lewis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with A. O. Lewis. A. O. Lewis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 178 | |
| 2 | 15 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | Examining the Efficacy of the Multi-Rater Analysis Methodology as an Alternative Approach in Determining Stakeholder Power, Influence and Resistance | 7 |
| 5 | Achieving Strategic Advantage and Organizational Legitimacy for Small and Medium Sized NFPs through the Implementation of Knowledge Management | 14 |
| 6 | 18 | |
| 7 | Relationship between the use of information technology (it) and performances of human resources management (hrm) | 5 |
| 8 | Strategic posture and financial performance of the banking industry in California : a strategic management study | 5 |
About A. O. Lewis
A. O. Lewis is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Management Information Systems and Anthropology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 243 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovation and Knowledge Management (2 papers), Economic and Technological Innovation (1 paper) and Complex Systems and Decision Making (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Strategy and Management (94 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (27 citations) and Management Information Systems (33 citations). A. O. Lewis has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Kipley, Roxanne Helm-Stevens, H. Igor Ansoff, Rick Ansoff and Irene Lee. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Management Research and UMI eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.