Jillian Craigie
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Philosophy top 2%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Cordelia FineIan GoldMark GardnerArlene S. KanterMichael BachOliver LewisScott Y. H. KimLisa Bortolotti
- Topics
- Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (7 papers)Mental Health and Psychiatry (5 papers)Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers)
- Journals
- Experimental Cell ResearchJournal of Evaluation in Clinical PracticeInternational Journal of Law and Psychiatry
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaCanada
In The Last Decade
Jillian Craigie
17 papers receiving 391 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Psychiatry and Mental health 208
- Philosophy 170
- Clinical Psychology 123
- Cognitive Neuroscience 95
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 80
Countries citing papers authored by Jillian Craigie
This map shows the geographic impact of Jillian Craigie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jillian Craigie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jillian Craigie more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jillian Craigie
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jillian Craigie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jillian Craigie. The network helps show where Jillian Craigie may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jillian Craigie
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jillian Craigie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jillian Craigie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jillian Craigie. Jillian Craigie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 23 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 13 | |
| 6 | 19 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | Neuroscience and Legal Responsibility | 1 |
| 12 | 26 | |
| 13 | 26 | |
| 14 | 235 | |
| 15 | Damned If You Do; Damned If You Don't: The Impasse in Cognitive Accounts of the Capgras Delusion | 9 |
| 16 | The Explanation Approach to Delusion | 5 |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | 18 |
About Jillian Craigie
Jillian Craigie is a scholar working on Philosophy, Clinical Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 18 papers that have together received 410 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (7 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (5 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (170 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (208 citations) and General Decision Sciences (20 citations). Jillian Craigie has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Cordelia Fine, Ian Gold, Mark Gardner, Arlene S. Kanter, Michael Bach, Oliver Lewis, Scott Y. H. Kim, Lisa Bortolotti, Christos Tikellis and Renate M. Kalnins. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Cell Research, Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice and International Journal of Law and Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.