Consultants Bureau

409 citations
6 papers · 282 indexed · h-index 5
Topics
advanced mathematical theories (1 paper)Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (1 paper)Nuclear Physics and Applications (1 paper)
Journals
Medical Entomology and ZoologyAmerican Institute of Physics eBooks

In The Last Decade

Consultants Bureau

6 papers receiving 250 citations

Peers

Consultants Bureau
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 156
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 116
  • Materials Chemistry 109
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 23
  • Mechanics of Materials 20
Replace H. Umezaki with:
H. Umezaki Japan
V. F. Kovalenko Ukraine
M. Fukuma Japan
G. K. T. Conn United Kingdom
Y. Shiraki Japan
Gerhard A. Koepf United States
R. Kakoschke Germany
A. S. Rodrigues Portugal
Yutaka Uematsu Japan
I. Mojzes Hungary
Consultants Bureau relative to H. Umezaki Japan H. Umezaki's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
H. Umezaki · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Consultants Bureau

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Consultants Bureau's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Consultants Bureau with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Consultants Bureau more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Consultants Bureau

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Consultants Bureau. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Consultants Bureau. The network helps show where Consultants Bureau may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Consultants Bureau

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Consultants Bureau. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Consultants Bureau based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Consultants Bureau. Consultants Bureau is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1
Doklady biological sciences : proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR
1
2
Russian chemical bulletin
6
3
Mathematical notes of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR
31
4
Soviet physics. Semiconductors
223
5
Contemporary problems of metallurgy
9
6
Theoretical principles of isotope methods for investigating chemical reactions
12

About Consultants Bureau

Consultants Bureau is a scholar working on Pharmaceutical Science, Radiation and Mathematical Physics, having authored 6 papers that have together received 282 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include advanced mathematical theories (1 paper), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (1 paper) and Nuclear Physics and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (116 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (156 citations) and Materials Chemistry (109 citations). Frequent co-authors include Российская академия наук and Академия наук Ссср. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Entomology and Zoology and American Institute of Physics eBooks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026