Consultants Bureau

409 total citations
6 papers, 282 citations indexed

About

Consultants Bureau is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Pharmaceutical Science and Ocean Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Consultants Bureau has authored 6 papers receiving a total of 282 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 1 paper in Mathematical Physics, 1 paper in Pharmaceutical Science and 1 paper in Ocean Engineering. Recurrent topics in Consultants Bureau's work include advanced mathematical theories (1 paper), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (1 paper) and Nuclear Physics and Applications (1 paper). Consultants Bureau is often cited by papers focused on advanced mathematical theories (1 paper), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (1 paper) and Nuclear Physics and Applications (1 paper). Consultants Bureau collaborates with scholars based in . Consultants Bureau's co-authors include Российская академия наук and Академия наук Ссср and has published in prestigious journals such as Medical Entomology and Zoology and American Institute of Physics eBooks.

In The Last Decade

Consultants Bureau

6 papers receiving 250 citations

Peers

Consultants Bureau
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 156
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 116
  • Materials Chemistry 109
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 23
  • Mechanics of Materials 20
Replace H. Umezaki with:
H. Umezaki Japan
D. P. Tewari India
Y. Shiraki Japan
Yu. V. Sharvin Russia
W. E. Krag United States
I. Mojzes Hungary
Adam Paszkiewicz Poland
A. Kamal India
S. Y. Yamamoto United States
L.K. Anderson United States
H. Umezaki Japan View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Consultants Bureau
Consultants Bureau · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Consultants Bureau
Consultants Bureau · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Consultants Bureau

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Consultants Bureau's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Consultants Bureau with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Consultants Bureau more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Consultants Bureau

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Consultants Bureau. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Consultants Bureau. The network helps show where Consultants Bureau may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Consultants Bureau

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Consultants Bureau. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Consultants Bureau based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Consultants Bureau. Consultants Bureau is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1
Doklady biological sciences : proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR
1
2
Russian chemical bulletin
6
3
Mathematical notes of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR
31
4
Soviet physics. Semiconductors
223
5
Contemporary problems of metallurgy
9
6
Theoretical principles of isotope methods for investigating chemical reactions
12

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026