Constanze Depp

37 total papers · 1.4k total citations
12 papers, 285 citations indexed

About

Constanze Depp is a scholar working on Neurology, Physiology and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Constanze Depp has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 285 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Neurology, 5 papers in Physiology and 4 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Constanze Depp's work include Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (6 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (4 papers) and Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (3 papers). Constanze Depp is often cited by papers focused on Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (6 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (4 papers) and Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (3 papers). Constanze Depp collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Constanze Depp's co-authors include Klaus‐Armin Nave, Alexandra I. Mot, Samuel Evetts, Michal Rolinski, Fahd Baig, Claudio Ruffmann, Richard Wade‐Martins, Joshua Shulman, Geoffrey I. Johnston and Javier Alegre‐Abarrategui and has published in prestigious journals such as Neuron, Immunity and International Journal of Molecular Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Constanze Depp

12 papers receiving 284 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Constanze Depp	116	110	83	67	59	12	285
Ietje Mantingh-Otter	104 0.9×	101 0.9×	82 1.0×	90 1.3×	33 0.6×	8	319
Elizaveta B. Boitsova	138 1.2×	94 0.9×	67 0.8×	52 0.8×	29 0.5×	15	314
Li‐Pao Fang	89 0.8×	117 1.1×	61 0.7×	60 0.9×	27 0.5×	15	282
Xiaoqi Hong	94 0.8×	116 1.1×	47 0.6×	119 1.8×	72 1.2×	14	330
Sara L. Domínguez	69 0.6×	140 1.3×	67 0.8×	55 0.8×	81 1.4×	14	329
Sheryl Feng	161 1.4×	101 0.9×	43 0.5×	53 0.8×	36 0.6×	11	310
Shannon E. Rose	80 0.7×	91 0.8×	95 1.1×	57 0.9×	39 0.7×	17	306
Zhengzheng Ruan	152 1.3×	83 0.8×	43 0.5×	68 1.0×	69 1.2×	9	293
Brittany Bolduc Lachance	60 0.5×	114 1.0×	49 0.6×	37 0.6×	43 0.7×	9	261
Kasey E. Moritz	82 0.7×	100 0.9×	44 0.5×	39 0.6×	44 0.7×	9	301

Countries citing papers authored by Constanze Depp

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Constanze Depp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Constanze Depp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Constanze Depp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Constanze Depp

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Constanze Depp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Constanze Depp. The network helps show where Constanze Depp may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Constanze Depp

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Constanze Depp. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Constanze Depp based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Constanze Depp. Constanze Depp is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact