Constance Shope
About
In The Last Decade
Constance Shope
8 papers receiving 330 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Clinical Psychology 159
- Psychiatry and Mental health 127
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 68
- Biological Psychiatry 65
- Molecular Biology 58
Countries citing papers authored by Constance Shope
This map shows the geographic impact of Constance Shope's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Constance Shope with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Constance Shope more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Constance Shope
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Constance Shope. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Constance Shope. The network helps show where Constance Shope may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Constance Shope
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Constance Shope. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Constance Shope based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Constance Shope. Constance Shope is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 24 | |
| 2 | 99 | |
| 3 | 31 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 19 | |
| 6 | 31 | |
| 7 | 117 | |
| 8 | 10 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.