Pál Czobor
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 0.05%
- Clinical Psychology top 0.5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 1%
- Philosophy top 0.1%
- Co-authors
- Jan VolavkaIstván BitterLeslie CitromeMenahem KrakowskiViktória SimonSára BálintÁgnes MészárosThomas B. Cooper
- Topics
- Schizophrenia research and treatment (95 papers)Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (39 papers)Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (30 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesHungaryAustria
In The Last Decade
Pál Czobor
185 papers receiving 10.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 162
- Psychiatry and Mental health 7.1k
- Clinical Psychology 3.2k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 2.7k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.2k
- Philosophy 1.2k
Countries citing papers authored by Pál Czobor
This map shows the geographic impact of Pál Czobor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pál Czobor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pál Czobor more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Pál Czobor
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pál Czobor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pál Czobor. The network helps show where Pál Czobor may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pál Czobor
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pál Czobor. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pál Czobor based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Pál Czobor. Pál Czobor is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 17 | |
| 4 | 46 | |
| 5 | 36 | |
| 6 | Treatment adherence and insight in schizophrenia. | 31 |
| 7 | 29 | |
| 8 | A Meta-Analysis of Cognitive Remediation for Schizophrenia: Methodology and Effect Sizesbreakdown → | 1193 |
| 9 | 28 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 50 | |
| 12 | [Detailed review of epidemiologic studies on adult Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)]. | 10 |
| 13 | 14 | |
| 14 | 30 | |
| 15 | 77 | |
| 16 | 16 | |
| 17 | 120 | |
| 18 | 353 | |
| 19 | 147 | |
| 20 | 32 |
About Pál Czobor
Pál Czobor is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Biological Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology, having authored 197 papers that have together received 10.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (95 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (39 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (30 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (7.1k citations), Biological Psychiatry (496 citations) and Clinical Psychology (3.2k citations). Pál Czobor has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Hungary and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Jan Volavka, István Bitter, Leslie Citrome, Menahem Krakowski, Viktória Simon, Sára Bálint, Ágnes Mészáros, Thomas B. Cooper, Jean-Pierre Lindenmayer and Til Wykes. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, The Lancet and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.