Concepción de Inés

18 total papers · 554 total citations
14 papers, 457 citations indexed

About

Concepción de Inés is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cell Biology and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, Concepción de Inés has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 457 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Molecular Biology, 5 papers in Cell Biology and 4 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in Concepción de Inés's work include Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (5 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (4 papers) and Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (3 papers). Concepción de Inés is often cited by papers focused on Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (5 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (4 papers) and Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (3 papers). Concepción de Inés collaborates with scholars based in Spain, Germany and United States. Concepción de Inés's co-authors include Isabel Barasoaı́n, Azucena González‐Coloma, Ana Guadaño, Rafael A. Martínez‐Díaz, Diego Cortés, Claudette Briand, Patrick L. Garcia, Monte J. Radeke, Stuart C. Feinstein and Lori A. Kohlstaedt and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Immunology, Biochemistry and Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry.

In The Last Decade

Concepción de Inés

14 papers receiving 445 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Concepción de Inés 252 149 130 65 62 14 457
Hye Kyung Ju 218 0.9× 31 0.2× 76 0.6× 98 1.5× 49 0.8× 14 431
Joseph T. Woitach 335 1.3× 49 0.3× 91 0.7× 77 1.2× 50 0.8× 11 534
Danqing Xu 304 1.2× 50 0.3× 46 0.4× 69 1.1× 102 1.6× 16 512
A. Ferretti 207 0.8× 44 0.3× 43 0.3× 46 0.7× 47 0.8× 25 477
L. Nedyalkova 301 1.2× 42 0.3× 68 0.5× 49 0.8× 22 0.4× 9 527
Michael F. Byford 365 1.4× 83 0.6× 48 0.4× 43 0.7× 14 0.2× 14 520
Rashmi Dahiya 321 1.3× 35 0.2× 64 0.5× 55 0.8× 24 0.4× 16 457
Jinwei Wu 267 1.1× 63 0.4× 127 1.0× 30 0.5× 50 0.8× 19 483
Weigang Huang 243 1.0× 58 0.4× 42 0.3× 75 1.2× 34 0.5× 26 460
John P. Holleran 189 0.8× 35 0.2× 52 0.4× 65 1.0× 34 0.5× 18 421

Countries citing papers authored by Concepción de Inés

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Concepción de Inés's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Concepción de Inés with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Concepción de Inés more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Concepción de Inés

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Concepción de Inés. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Concepción de Inés. The network helps show where Concepción de Inés may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Concepción de Inés

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Concepción de Inés. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Concepción de Inés based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Concepción de Inés. Concepción de Inés is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026