Con Menictas

805 total citations · 1 hit paper
5 papers, 556 citations indexed

About

Con Menictas is a scholar working on Marketing, Economics and Econometrics and Management Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Con Menictas has authored 5 papers receiving a total of 556 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Marketing, 3 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 1 paper in Management Information Systems. Recurrent topics in Con Menictas's work include Economic and Environmental Valuation (3 papers), Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (2 papers) and Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (2 papers). Con Menictas is often cited by papers focused on Economic and Environmental Valuation (3 papers), Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (2 papers) and Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (2 papers). Con Menictas collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Netherlands and Austria. Con Menictas's co-authors include Christian Nitzl, Christian M. Ringle, Joseph F. Hair, Siegfried P. Gudergan, Andreas Fischer, Mehmet K. Mahmut, Richard J. Stevenson, Judi Homewood, Alan Fekete and Hajo A. Reijers and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Psychological Assessment and Journal of Systems and Software.

In The Last Decade

Con Menictas

4 papers receiving 527 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Partial least squares structural equation modeling-based discrete choice modeling: an illustration in modeling retailer choice

2018 355 citations Joseph F. Hair, Christian M. Ringle et al. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Con Menictas Australia	4	154	114	97	90	77	5	556
Ali Nawaz Khan China	13	104 0.7×	45 0.4×	109 1.1×	111 1.2×	69 0.9×	33	511
Tracey E. Rizzuto United States	14	159 1.0×	39 0.3×	83 0.9×	125 1.4×	52 0.7×	24	695
Junhui Yang China	5	112 0.7×	46 0.4×	89 0.9×	87 1.0×	30 0.4×	13	566
Chengquan Huang United States	6	120 0.8×	47 0.4×	90 0.9×	88 1.0×	31 0.4×	9	561
Ruwan Bandara Australia	14	283 1.8×	36 0.3×	134 1.4×	85 0.9×	130 1.7×	21	657
Colleen Carraher Wolverton United States	9	150 1.0×	24 0.2×	67 0.7×	70 0.8×	49 0.6×	19	430
Fadi Abdel Muniem Abdel Fattah Oman	14	182 1.2×	29 0.3×	149 1.5×	77 0.9×	65 0.8×	28	472
Jieqi Guan Macao	9	177 1.1×	70 0.6×	103 1.1×	67 0.7×	14 0.2×	28	619
Sangeeta Mehrolia India	10	180 1.2×	40 0.4×	247 2.5×	53 0.6×	28 0.4×	26	571
Mauro Capestro Italy	12	88 0.6×	40 0.4×	152 1.6×	108 1.2×	48 0.6×	26	518

Countries citing papers authored by Con Menictas

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Con Menictas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Con Menictas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Con Menictas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Con Menictas

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Con Menictas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Con Menictas. The network helps show where Con Menictas may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Con Menictas

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Con Menictas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Con Menictas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Con Menictas. Con Menictas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

5 of 5 papers shown

1.

Hair, Joseph F., Christian M. Ringle, Siegfried P. Gudergan, et al.. (2018). Partial least squares structural equation modeling-based discrete choice modeling: an illustration in modeling retailer choice. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 12(1). 115–142. 355 indexed citations breakdown →

2.

Fekete, Alan, et al.. (2011). Making sense of business process descriptions: An experimental comparison of graphical and textual notations. Journal of Systems and Software. 85(3). 596–606. 76 indexed citations

3.

Mahmut, Mehmet K., Con Menictas, Richard J. Stevenson, & Judi Homewood. (2011). Validating the factor structure of the Self-Report Psychopathy Scale in a community sample.. Psychological Assessment. 23(3). 670–678. 108 indexed citations

4.

Menictas, Con, et al.. (2011). Assessing the Validity of Brand Equity Constructs. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ). 20(1). 3–8. 16 indexed citations

5.

Menictas, Con, Paul Wang, & Jordan J. Louviere. (2010). Assessing the Validity of Brand Equity Constructs: A Comparison of Two Approaches. UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact