Colin Stephen

462 citations
7 papers · 304 · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

Colin Stephen

6 papers receiving 298 citations

Peers

Colin Stephen
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
  • Materials Chemistry 244
  • Computational Mechanics 101
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 132
  • Geophysics 51
  • Biomedical Engineering 87
Replace Angelo Frangeskou with:
Angelo Frangeskou United Kingdom
Sam Johnson United Kingdom
Shazeaa N. Ishmael United Kingdom
Laiyi Weng United Kingdom
Christian Osterkamp Germany
Noel Wan United States
Johannes Görlitz Germany
A. C. Stanley‐Clarke United Kingdom
Julia Michl Germany
Dominik Rohner Switzerland
Colin Stephen relative to Angelo Frangeskou United Kingdom Angelo Frangeskou's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Angelo Frangeskou · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Colin Stephen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Colin Stephen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Colin Stephen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Colin Stephen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Colin Stephen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Colin Stephen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Colin Stephen. The network helps show where Colin Stephen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Colin Stephen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Colin Stephen Line = papers co-authored together Colin Stephen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1 2016217
2 202238
3 202329
4 202315
5 20253
6 20252
7 20250

About Colin Stephen

Colin Stephen is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Geophysics, Biomedical Engineering and Computational Mechanics, having authored 7 papers that have together received 304 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (6 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (4 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (3 papers), Carbon Nanotubes in Composites (1 paper), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (1 paper), Laser Material Processing Techniques (1 paper), Nonlinear Optical Materials Studies (1 paper) and Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Materials Chemistry (244 citations), Computational Mechanics (101 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (132 citations), Geophysics (51 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (87 citations). Colin Stephen has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Gavin W. Morley, Angelo Frangeskou, Ben L. Green, Laiyi Weng, Sebastian Knauer, Martin J. Booth, Shazeaa N. Ishmael, Mark E. Newton, Philip R. Dolan and Patrick S. Salter. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Applied, Physical review. B., Diamond and Related Materials, Nature Photonics and Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact