Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Coffee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Coffee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Coffee more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Coffee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Coffee. The network helps show where Coffee may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Coffee
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Coffee.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Coffee based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Coffee. Coffee is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Coffee, et al.. (2014). "When Smoke Gets in Your Eyes": Myth and Reality about the Synthesis of Private Counsel and Public Client. The De Paul law review. 51(2). 241.
2.
Coffee & C John. (2012). Mapping the Future of Insider Trading Law: Of Boundaries, Gaps, and Strategies. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2013. 281.
3.
Coffee & C John. (2011). Systemic Risk after Dodd-Frank: Contingent Capital and the Need for Regulatory Strategies beyond Oversight. Columbia Law Review. 111. 795.35 indexed citations
4.
Coffee, et al.. (2007). Law and the Market: The Impact of Enforcement. University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 156(2). 229.97 indexed citations
5.
Coffee & C John. (2005). Causation by Presumption? Why the Supreme Court Should Reject Phantom Losses and Reverse Broudo. 60. 533.3 indexed citations
6.
Coffee & Caron H. St. John. (2003). What Caused Enron?: A Capsule Social and Economic History of the 1990's. Cornell law review/The Cornell law quarterly. 89(214). 269.48 indexed citations
7.
Coffee & C John. (2002). Law and Regulatory Competition: Can They Co-Exist?. Texas law review. 80(7). 1729.2 indexed citations
8.
Coffee, et al.. (2002). Understanding Enron: "It's About the Gatekeepers, Stupid". 57. 1403.71 indexed citations
Coffee, et al.. (1997). Brave New World?: The Impact(s) of the Internet on Modern Securities Regulation. 52. 1195.10 indexed citations
11.
Coffee, et al.. (1996). The Future of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act: Or, Why the Fat Lady Has Not Yet Sung. 51. 975.5 indexed citations
12.
Coffee, et al.. (1995). Corruption of the Class Action: The New Technology of Collusion. Cornell law review/The Cornell law quarterly. 80(4). 851.2 indexed citations
13.
Coffee & C John. (1995). Competition Versus Consolidation: The Significance of Organizational Structure in Financial and Securities Regulation. 50. 447.12 indexed citations
14.
Coffee & C John. (1993). New Myths and Old Realities: The American Law Institute Faces the Derivative Action. 48. 1407.7 indexed citations
15.
Coffee, et al.. (1991). Does "Unlawful" Mean "Criminal"?: Reflections on the Disappearing Tort/Crime Distinction in American Law. Boston University law review. 71. 193.29 indexed citations
16.
Coffee, et al.. (1989). Unstable Coalitions: Corporate Governance as a Multi-Player Game. The Georgetown law journal. 78. 1495.16 indexed citations
17.
Coffee, et al.. (1988). No Exit?: Opting Out, The Contractual Theory of the Corporation, and the Special Case of Remedies. Brooklyn law review. 53. 919.7 indexed citations
18.
Coffee, et al.. (1987). Rethinking the Class Action: A Policy Primer on Reform. Indiana law journal. 62(3). 5.3 indexed citations
19.
Coffee, et al.. (1983). Rescuing the Private Attorney General: Why the Model of the Lawyer as Bounty Hunter is Not Working. Maryland law review. 42(2). 215.21 indexed citations
20.
Coffee, et al.. (1978). The Repressed Issues of Sentencing: Accountability, Predictability, and Equality in the Era of the Sentencing Commission. The Georgetown law journal. 66. 975.9 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.