Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Holger Spamann
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Holger Spamann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Holger Spamann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Holger Spamann more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Holger Spamann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Holger Spamann. The network helps show where Holger Spamann may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Holger Spamann
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Holger Spamann.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Holger Spamann based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Holger Spamann. Holger Spamann is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Klöhn, Lars, et al.. (2018). Precedent and Chinese Judges: An Experiment. SSRN Electronic Journal.5 indexed citations
9.
Spamann, Holger & Lars Klöhn. (2016). Justice is Less Blind, and Less Legalistic, than We Thought: Evidence from an Experiment with Real Judges. SSRN Electronic Journal.6 indexed citations
10.
Naughton, James P. & Holger Spamann. (2015). Deficiencies in Accounting and Financial Reporting of State and Municipal Governments. 85(6).1 indexed citations
11.
Spamann, Holger. (2015). Empirical Comparative Law. Annual Review of Law and Social Science. 11(1). 131–153.32 indexed citations
Spamann, Holger. (2010). Legal Origins, Civil Procedure, and the Quality of Contract Enforcement. Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University).3 indexed citations
14.
Spamann, Holger. (2010). The Myth of 'Rebalancing' Retaliation in WTO Dispute Settlement Practice. Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University).
15.
Bebchuk, Lucian A. & Holger Spamann. (2009). Regulating Bankers' Pay. The Georgetown law journal.202 indexed citations
16.
Bebchuk, Lucian A., Alma Cohen, & Holger Spamann. (2009). The Wages of Failure: Executive Compensation at Bear Stearns and Lehman 2000-2008. Yale journal on regulation. 27(2). 3.203 indexed citations
17.
Spamann, Holger. (2009). Contemporary Legal Transplants -- Legal Families and the Diffusion of (Corporate) Law. Brigham Young University law review. 2009(6). 1813–1878.33 indexed citations
Klerman, Daniel M., Paul G. Mahoney, Holger Spamann, & Mark Weinstein. (2009). Legal Origin and Economic Growth. SSRN Electronic Journal.4 indexed citations
20.
Mahoney, Paul G., Daniel M. Klerman, Holger Spamann, & Mark Weinstein. (2008). Legal Origin and Economic Growth. SSRN Electronic Journal.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.