Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of C John's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C John with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C John more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C John. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C John. The network helps show where C John may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of C John
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C John.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C John based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with C John. C John is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
16 of 16 papers shown
1.
Coffee & C John. (2015). Extraterritorial Financial Regulation: Why E.T. Can't Come Home. Cornell law review/The Cornell law quarterly. 99(6). 1259.5 indexed citations
2.
Thomas, E. J. & C John. (2015). Clear and Convincing Disparagement: An Argument for a Higher Evidentiary Standard for When the T.T.A.B. Considers Cancelling a Well-Known, Tenured Trademark. 22(2). 435.
3.
John, C, et al.. (2012). The Liability Rule for Constitutional Torts. SSRN Electronic Journal.3 indexed citations
4.
Coffee & C John. (2012). Mapping the Future of Insider Trading Law: Of Boundaries, Gaps, and Strategies. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2013. 281.
5.
Coffee & C John. (2011). Systemic Risk after Dodd-Frank: Contingent Capital and the Need for Regulatory Strategies beyond Oversight. Columbia Law Review. 111. 795.35 indexed citations
6.
Coffee & C John. (2010). Ratings Reform: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. 1. 231.23 indexed citations
7.
Coffee & C John. (2005). Causation by Presumption? Why the Supreme Court Should Reject Phantom Losses and Reverse Broudo. 60. 533.3 indexed citations
8.
Coffee & C John. (2005). Can Lawyers Wear Blinders? Gatekeepers and Third-Party Opinions. 84. 59.3 indexed citations
9.
Coffee & C John. (2002). Law and Regulatory Competition: Can They Co-Exist?. Texas law review. 80(7). 1729.2 indexed citations
10.
John, C, et al.. (2000). Nachfrist Was Ist? Thinking Globally and Acting Locally: Considering Time Extension Principles of the U.N. Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods in Revising the Uniform Commercial Code. Brigham Young University law review. 2000(4). 1363–1412.1 indexed citations
Coffee & C John. (1999). Privatization and Corporate Governance: The Lessons from Securities Market Failure. The Journal of corporation law. 25(1). 1.111 indexed citations
13.
Coffee & C John. (1995). Competition Versus Consolidation: The Significance of Organizational Structure in Financial and Securities Regulation. 50. 447.12 indexed citations
14.
Coffee & C John. (1993). New Myths and Old Realities: The American Law Institute Faces the Derivative Action. 48. 1407.7 indexed citations
15.
John, C, et al.. (1992). "If It Quacks Like a Duck:" Comparing the ICJ Chambers to International Arbitration for a Mechanism of Enforcement. 16(1). 43.1 indexed citations
16.
Coffee & C John. (1988). The Uncertain Case for Takeover Reform: An Essay on Stockholders, Stakeholders and Bust-Ups. 1988. 435.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.