C.M. Forsyth

1.2k citations
14 papers · 904 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

    • Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders 8
    • Neurological disorders and treatments 7
    • Biochemical and Structural Characterization 4

C.M. Forsyth

14 papers receiving 875 citations

Peers

C.M. Forsyth
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Neurology 529
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 344
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 250
  • Endocrinology 42
  • Biotechnology 58
Replace Isin N. Geren with:
Isin N. Geren United States
Markel Martínez‐Carranza Sweden
Saskia Helmsing Germany
Ching-Hui Liu United States
Doris Meier Germany
Steffen Müller Germany
Mandy Unger Germany
Séverine Divoux France
Suraj Saksena United States
Clifton E. McPherson United States
C.M. Forsyth relative to Isin N. Geren United States Isin N. Geren's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Isin N. Geren · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C.M. Forsyth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C.M. Forsyth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C.M. Forsyth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C.M. Forsyth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C.M. Forsyth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C.M. Forsyth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C.M. Forsyth. The network helps show where C.M. Forsyth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C.M. Forsyth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C.M. Forsyth Line = papers co-authored together C.M. Forsyth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2005217
2 2006146
3 2005113
4 200698
5 200695
6 201059
7 201349
8 201048
9 202030
10 200522
11 200415
12 20217
13 20114
14 20181

About C.M. Forsyth

C.M. Forsyth is a scholar working on Neurology, Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Immunology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 14 papers that have together received 904 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (8 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (7 papers), Hereditary Neurological Disorders (5 papers), Biochemical and Structural Characterization (4 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (3 papers), Transgenic Plants and Applications (2 papers), T-cell and B-cell Immunology (2 papers) and Immune Cell Function and Interaction (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (529 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (344 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (250 citations), Endocrinology (42 citations) and Biotechnology (58 citations). C.M. Forsyth has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include James D. Marks, Isin N. Geren, Lewis J. Smith, Jianlong Lou, Sherry L. LaPorte, Theresa J. Smith, William H. Tepp, Eric A. Johnson, Raphaël Lévy and Richard Tsai. Their work appears in journals such as Protein Engineering Design and Selection, Journal of Molecular Biology, The Journal of Immunology, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics and mAbs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact