Cliona O’Sullivan

31 papers receiving 653 citations

Peers

Cliona O’Sullivan
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Rehabilitation 61
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 58
  • Occupational Therapy 22
  • Pharmacology 85
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 22
Replace Ulrike Van Daele with:
Ulrike Van Daele Belgium
Witness Mudzi South Africa
Jong-Moon Hwang South Korea
Nezire Köse Türkiye
Jakub Grzegorz Adamczyk Poland
Sofía Pérez‐Alenda Spain
Sara Reina‐Gutiérrez Spain
Melinda Cairns United Kingdom
C Bertolini Italy
Cheryl Hefford New Zealand
Cliona O’Sullivan relative to Ulrike Van Daele Belgium Ulrike Van Daele's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Ulrike Van Daele · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cliona O’Sullivan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cliona O’Sullivan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cliona O’Sullivan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cliona O’Sullivan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cliona O’Sullivan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cliona O’Sullivan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cliona O’Sullivan. The network helps show where Cliona O’Sullivan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cliona O’Sullivan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cliona O’Sullivan Line = papers co-authored together Cliona O’Sullivan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200979
2 201978
3 202161
4 201457
5 200950
6 201342
7 201840
8 201227
9 202027
10 202024
11 202023
12 202122
13 201620
14 202117
15 201216
16 201814
17 202111
18 202011
19 20179
20 20188

About Cliona O’Sullivan

Cliona O’Sullivan is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Surgery, Pharmacology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and Occupational Therapy, having authored 36 papers that have together received 677 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nursing Roles and Practices (7 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (4 papers), Shoulder Injury and Treatment (3 papers), Sports injuries and prevention (3 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (3 papers), Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (2 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (2 papers) and Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (61 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (58 citations), Occupational Therapy (22 citations), Pharmacology (85 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (22 citations). Cliona O’Sullivan has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include María Stokes, Catherine Blake, G. Kelly, John Gormley, Olive Lennon, Ebonie Rio, Samuel Fernández‐Carnero, Jackie L. Whittaker, Deydre S. Teyhen and Julie A. Hides. Their work appears in journals such as Musculoskeletal Care, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Musculoskeletal Science and Practice, Journal of Molecular Biology and Disability and Rehabilitation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact