Clinton DeW. Van Siclen
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 10%
- Materials Chemistry
- Mechanics of Materials top 10%
- Atmospheric Science top 10%
- Radiation top 5%
- Co-authors
- Steven JonesH. H. FarrellA.J. CaffreyJames S. CohenK.D. WattsJ. N. BradburyA. N. AndersonM. Leon
- Topics
- nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions (8 papers)Theoretical and Computational Physics (5 papers)Nuclear Materials and Properties (5 papers)
- Journals
- Physical Review LettersJournal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresPhysical review. B, Condensed matter
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Clinton DeW. Van Siclen
33 papers receiving 594 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 229
- Materials Chemistry 210
- Mechanics of Materials 141
- Atmospheric Science 118
- Radiation 97
Countries citing papers authored by Clinton DeW. Van Siclen
This map shows the geographic impact of Clinton DeW. Van Siclen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clinton DeW. Van Siclen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinton DeW. Van Siclen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Clinton DeW. Van Siclen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clinton DeW. Van Siclen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clinton DeW. Van Siclen. The network helps show where Clinton DeW. Van Siclen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Clinton DeW. Van Siclen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Clinton DeW. Van Siclen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Clinton DeW. Van Siclen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Clinton DeW. Van Siclen. Clinton DeW. Van Siclen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 23 | |
| 7 | 31 | |
| 8 | 50 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | 78 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 72 | |
| 18 | 134 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Clinton DeW. Van Siclen
Clinton DeW. Van Siclen is a scholar working on Acoustics and Ultrasonics, Radiation and Atmospheric Science, having authored 33 papers that have together received 631 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions (8 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (5 papers) and Nuclear Materials and Properties (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geochemistry and Petrology (91 citations), Radiation (97 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (229 citations). Clinton DeW. Van Siclen has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Steven Jones, H. H. Farrell, A.J. Caffrey, James S. Cohen, K.D. Watts, J. N. Bradbury, A. N. Anderson, M. Leon, M. A. Paciotti and R. N. Wright. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres and Physical review. B, Condensed matter.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.