Clinton D. Protack

1.5k total citations
35 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Clinton D. Protack is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery and Emergency Medical Services. According to data from OpenAlex, Clinton D. Protack has authored 35 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, 19 papers in Surgery and 8 papers in Emergency Medical Services. Recurrent topics in Clinton D. Protack's work include Vascular Procedures and Complications (10 papers), Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis (8 papers) and Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (7 papers). Clinton D. Protack is often cited by papers focused on Vascular Procedures and Complications (10 papers), Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis (8 papers) and Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (7 papers). Clinton D. Protack collaborates with scholars based in United States, Japan and China. Clinton D. Protack's co-authors include Mark G. Davies, Andrew M. Bakken, David L. Waldman, Alan Dardik, Wael E. Saad, David E. Lee, Roland Assi, Caroline C. Jadlowiec, Kota Yamamoto and Hualong Bai and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology.

In The Last Decade

Clinton D. Protack

35 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Clinton D. Protack
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Surgery 575
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 531
  • Emergency Medical Services 436
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 193
  • Neurology 181
Replace Toshiya Nishibe with:
Toshiya Nishibe Japan
Haidi Hu China
Kota Yamamoto Japan
Erney Mattsson Sweden
Fabio A. Kudo Japan
Sang Won Rhee United States
François Saucy Switzerland
Naomichi Nishikimi Japan
Korff Krause Germany
Rafael Ruíz-Salmerón Spain
Toshiya Nishibe Japan View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Clinton D. Protack
Clinton D. Protack · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Clinton D. Protack
Clinton D. Protack · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Clinton D. Protack

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Clinton D. Protack's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clinton D. Protack with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinton D. Protack more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Clinton D. Protack

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clinton D. Protack. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clinton D. Protack. The network helps show where Clinton D. Protack may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Clinton D. Protack

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Clinton D. Protack. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Clinton D. Protack based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Clinton D. Protack. Clinton D. Protack is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 1
2 3
3 29
4 32
5 16
6 73
7 15
8 11
9 11
10 2
11 1
12 15
13 77
14 4
15 24
16 23
17 37
18 82
19 71
20 183

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026