Clement C. Zai

198 papers receiving 3.6k citations

Peers

Clement C. Zai
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • Biological Psychiatry 439
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 1.3k
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 167
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 726
  • Clinical Psychology 695
Replace Diana De Ronchi with:
Diana De Ronchi Italy
Falk W. Lohoff United States
Toshiya Inada Japan
Ichiro Kusumi Japan
María J. Arranz United Kingdom
Laura Mandelli Italy
Pierandrea Muglia Italy
Nicole King Canada
Wade H. Berrettini United States
Svetlana А. Ivanova Russia
Clement C. Zai relative to Diana De Ronchi Italy Diana De Ronchi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Diana De Ronchi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Clement C. Zai

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Clement C. Zai's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clement C. Zai with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clement C. Zai more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Clement C. Zai

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clement C. Zai. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clement C. Zai. The network helps show where Clement C. Zai may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Clement C. Zai, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Clement C. Zai Line = papers co-authored together Clement C. Zai links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 209 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013116
2 2012103
3 201993
4 201083
5 201082
6 201271
7 201171
8 201867
9 200661
10 201259
11 201258
12 200957
13 201053
14 200852
15 201048
16 201148
17 201348
18 200947
19 201546
20 200045

About Clement C. Zai

Clement C. Zai is a scholar working on Biological Psychiatry, Psychiatry and Mental health, Behavioral Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 209 papers that have together received 3.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (43 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (37 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (32 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (30 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (26 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (20 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (18 papers) and Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (18 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (439 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (1.3k citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (167 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (726 citations) and Clinical Psychology (695 citations). Clement C. Zai has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include James L. Kennedy, Arun K. Tiwari, Daniel J. Müller, Jeffrey A. Lieberman, Herbert Y. Meltzer, Vincenzo De Luca, Behdin Nowrouzi‐Kia, Albert H.C. Wong, John S. Strauss and Sajid A. Shaikh. Their work appears in journals such as European Neuropsychopharmacology, Journal of Psychiatric Research, Schizophrenia Research, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry and The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026