Natalie Freeman

67 total papers · 1.0k total citations
40 papers, 724 citations indexed

About

Natalie Freeman is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Natalie Freeman has authored 40 papers receiving a total of 724 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 11 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 9 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Natalie Freeman's work include Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (10 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (7 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (5 papers). Natalie Freeman is often cited by papers focused on Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (10 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (7 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (5 papers). Natalie Freeman collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Germany. Natalie Freeman's co-authors include James L. Kennedy, Arun K. Tiwari, Daniel J. Müller, Clement C. Zai, Herbert Y. Meltzer, Jeffrey A. Lieberman, Eva J. Brandl, Amanda Robertson, Daniela J. Palombo and Rebecca M. Todd and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Brain and The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism.

In The Last Decade

Natalie Freeman

40 papers receiving 704 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Natalie Freeman 215 171 110 107 106 40 724
Nabilah I. Chowdhury 287 1.3× 69 0.4× 180 1.6× 120 1.1× 159 1.5× 21 684
Shoko Tsuchimine 273 1.3× 121 0.7× 112 1.0× 130 1.2× 62 0.6× 67 882
Erika L. Nurmi 177 0.8× 130 0.8× 99 0.9× 103 1.0× 78 0.7× 31 739
Małgorzata Maciukiewicz 201 0.9× 76 0.4× 140 1.3× 57 0.5× 108 1.0× 46 749
I‐Ching Lai 347 1.6× 115 0.7× 266 2.4× 209 2.0× 211 2.0× 37 878
Timothy L. Holman 497 2.3× 78 0.5× 152 1.4× 147 1.4× 85 0.8× 22 897
Michael Haberhausen 334 1.6× 54 0.3× 105 1.0× 78 0.7× 126 1.2× 18 645
Yoshiteru Takekita 317 1.5× 103 0.6× 210 1.9× 199 1.9× 57 0.5× 48 838
Yu‐Chih Shen 191 0.9× 74 0.4× 105 1.0× 96 0.9× 106 1.0× 64 679
Christo Minov 189 0.9× 63 0.4× 255 2.3× 300 2.8× 77 0.7× 19 768

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Freeman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Freeman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Freeman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Freeman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Freeman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Freeman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Freeman. The network helps show where Natalie Freeman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie Freeman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie Freeman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie Freeman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie Freeman. Natalie Freeman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026