Clayton W. Williams

528 citations
22 papers · 404 indexed · h-index 11

Clayton W. Williams

21 papers receiving 395 citations

Peers

Clayton W. Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Inorganic Chemistry 276
  • Materials Chemistry 272
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 39
  • Medical Terminology 1
  • Filtration and Separation 7
Replace Anna Moritz with:
Anna Moritz Germany
N.B. Mikheev Russia
Adeola F. Ojo Germany
Irene Ling Malaysia
R.L. Fellows United States
Ralph A. Zehnder United States
L. Uytterhoeven Belgium
A.S. Booij Netherlands
Christopher Pierce United States
Е. В. Чупрунов Russia
Clayton W. Williams relative to Anna Moritz Germany Anna Moritz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Anna Moritz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Clayton W. Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Clayton W. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clayton W. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clayton W. Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Clayton W. Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clayton W. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clayton W. Williams. The network helps show where Clayton W. Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Clayton W. Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Clayton W. Williams Line = papers co-authored together Clayton W. Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20112
2 200718
3
Building a results review system: a critical first step in transitioning from paper medical records.
20053
4 200530
5 200424
6 200334
7 20016
8 200018
9 199931
10 199946
11 199816
12 19982
13 199622
14 19911
15 19830
16 19839
17 198217
18 19695
19 19677
20 19666

About Clayton W. Williams

Clayton W. Williams is a scholar working on Inorganic Chemistry, Filtration and Separation and Materials Chemistry, having authored 22 papers that have together received 404 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Radioactive element chemistry and processing (7 papers), Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (6 papers), Polyoxometalates: Synthesis and Applications (6 papers), Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes (3 papers), Inorganic Fluorides and Related Compounds (3 papers), Luminescence Properties of Advanced Materials (3 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (2 papers) and Chemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous Solutions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Inorganic Chemistry (276 citations), Materials Chemistry (272 citations) and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (39 citations). Clayton W. Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Mark R. Antonio, L. Soderholm, Lynn C. Francesconi, Ming‐Hsi Chiang, James V. Beitz, S.R. Wasserman, Victor G. Young, Arnold L. Rheingold, Judit Bartis and William DeW. Horrocks. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Alloys and Compounds, The Journal of Physical Chemistry, Inorganic Chemistry, Solvent Extraction and Ion Exchange and Disasters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026