Clay T. Reed
Impact in
- Internal Medicine top 10%
- Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
-
- Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
- CAR-T cell therapy research
Papers in
- Oncology 5
- Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers 3
- Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies 2
- Lung Cancer Research Studies 1
- Cancer Risks and Factors 1
-
- Multiple and Secondary Primary Cancers 1
- Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances 1
- Co-authors
- Rachel Rosovsky (1 shared paper)Brittany Bankhead-Kendall (1 shared paper)Marvin G. Chang (1 shared paper)Adam Flaczyk (1 shared paper)Edward A. Bittner (1 shared paper)Stuart D Russell (1 shared paper)Stephen J. Riederer (1 shared paper)Noel M. Caplice (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Oncologist (2 papers)Journal of Clinical Oncology (1 paper)Annals of Oncology (1 paper)Journal of Nuclear Medicine (1 paper)Critical Care (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIreland
In The Last Decade
Clay T. Reed
8 papers receiving 284 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Internal Medicine 25
- Oncology 109
- Genetics 39
- Infectious Diseases 41
- Neurology 26
Countries citing papers authored by Clay T. Reed
This map shows the geographic impact of Clay T. Reed's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clay T. Reed with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clay T. Reed more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Clay T. Reed
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clay T. Reed. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clay T. Reed. The network helps show where Clay T. Reed may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Clay T. Reed, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 103 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 101 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 63 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 9 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 0 |
About Clay T. Reed
Clay T. Reed is a scholar working on Oncology, Epidemiology, Neurology, Infectious Diseases and Surgery, having authored 9 papers that have together received 291 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (3 papers), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (2 papers), Multiple and Secondary Primary Cancers (1 paper), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (1 paper), Lung Cancer Research Studies (1 paper), Cancer Risks and Factors (1 paper), Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (1 paper) and Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (25 citations), Oncology (109 citations), Genetics (39 citations), Infectious Diseases (41 citations) and Neurology (26 citations). Clay T. Reed has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Rachel Rosovsky, Brittany Bankhead-Kendall, Marvin G. Chang, Adam Flaczyk, Edward A. Bittner, Stuart D Russell, Stephen J. Riederer, Noel M. Caplice, Paul Sorajja and Panithaya Chareonthaitawee. Their work appears in journals such as The Oncologist, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Annals of Oncology, Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Critical Care.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.