Bradley J. Kemp

3.7k total citations · 2 hit papers
39 papers, 2.8k citations indexed

About

Bradley J. Kemp is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Physiology and Psychiatry and Mental health. According to data from OpenAlex, Bradley J. Kemp has authored 39 papers receiving a total of 2.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 9 papers in Physiology and 8 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health. Recurrent topics in Bradley J. Kemp's work include Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (14 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (8 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (8 papers). Bradley J. Kemp is often cited by papers focused on Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (14 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (8 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (8 papers). Bradley J. Kemp collaborates with scholars based in United States, Japan and Canada. Bradley J. Kemp's co-authors include Val J. Lowe, David S. Knopman, Ronald C. Petersen, Clifford R. Jack, Matthew L. Senjem, Stephen D. Weigand, Bradley F. Boeve, Maria M. Shiung, Jeffrey L. Gunter and Michael P. Weiner and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, NeuroImage and Brain.

In The Last Decade

Bradley J. Kemp

38 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories sort by overperformance

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Serial PIB and MRI in normal, mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: implications for sequence of pathological events in Alzheimer's disease

2009 826 citations Clifford R. Jack, Val J. Lowe et al. Brain profile →
11C PiB and structural MRI provide complementary information in imaging of Alzheimer's disease and amnestic mild cognitive impairment

2008 758 citations Clifford R. Jack, Val J. Lowe et al. Brain profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Bradley J. Kemp United States	23	1.4k	1.3k	779	621	337	39	2.8k
Richard J. Caselli United States	24	1.1k 0.8×	1.1k 0.8×	474 0.6×	656 1.1×	276 0.8×	57	2.7k
Hee Jin Kim South Korea	32	1.2k 0.9×	1.4k 1.0×	512 0.7×	672 1.1×	461 1.4×	185	3.0k
Samantha Galluzzi Italy	29	884 0.6×	1.2k 0.9×	651 0.8×	872 1.4×	221 0.7×	68	2.7k
Leonardo Iaccarino Italy	33	893 0.6×	778 0.6×	417 0.5×	607 1.0×	438 1.3×	106	2.9k
Manabu Tashiro Japan	36	1.1k 0.8×	601 0.5×	696 0.9×	511 0.8×	518 1.5×	179	3.9k
Matthew Bobinski United States	19	936 0.7×	858 0.6×	417 0.5×	485 0.8×	215 0.6×	50	2.0k
Stefan Förster Germany	34	629 0.4×	721 0.5×	1.2k 1.6×	811 1.3×	364 1.1×	121	3.4k
Nelleke Tolboom Netherlands	22	749 0.5×	728 0.5×	631 0.8×	563 0.9×	198 0.6×	69	1.9k
Maqsood Yaqub Netherlands	35	1.0k 0.7×	1.0k 0.8×	2.0k 2.6×	517 0.8×	426 1.3×	186	4.0k
Hyemin Jang South Korea	26	783 0.6×	889 0.7×	320 0.4×	322 0.5×	478 1.4×	174	2.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Bradley J. Kemp

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bradley J. Kemp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bradley J. Kemp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bradley J. Kemp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bradley J. Kemp

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bradley J. Kemp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bradley J. Kemp. The network helps show where Bradley J. Kemp may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bradley J. Kemp

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bradley J. Kemp. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bradley J. Kemp based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bradley J. Kemp. Bradley J. Kemp is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Tran, Nguyen H., et al.. (2025). Interpretive consistency of a qualitative 68Ga-PSMA PET framework for treatment response assessment in hepatocellular carcinoma: a head-to-head comparison with cross-sectional imaging. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 53(4). 2427–2438.

Laack, Nadia N., Deanna Pafundi, S. Keith Anderson, et al.. (2021). Initial Results of a Phase 2 Trial of 18F-DOPA PET-Guided Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy for Glioblastoma. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 110(5). 1383–1395. 40 indexed citations

Zeydan, Burcu, Christopher G. Schwarz, Scott A. Przybelski, et al.. (2021). Comparison of ¹¹C-Pittsburgh Compound B and ¹⁸F-Flutemetamol White Matter Binding in PET. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 63(8). 1239–1244. 8 indexed citations

Lehman, Vance T., Felix E. Diehn, Stephen M. Broski, et al.. (2019). Comparison of [¹⁸F] FDG-PET/MRI and Clinical Findings for Assessment of Suspected Lumbar Facet Joint Pain: A Prospective Study to Characterize Candidate Nonanatomic Imaging Biomarkers and Potential Impact on Management. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 40(10). 1779–1785. 3 indexed citations

Battle, Mark, Val J. Lowe, David S. Knopman, et al.. (2018). Centiloid scaling for quantification of brain amyloid with [18F]flutemetamol using multiple processing methods. EJNMMI Research. 8(1). 107–107. 70 indexed citations

Broski, Stephen M., Ajit H. Goenka, Bradley J. Kemp, & Geoffrey B. Johnson. (2018). Clinical PET/MRI: 2018 Update. American Journal of Roentgenology. 211(2). 295–313. 48 indexed citations

Delso, Gaspar, Bradley J. Kemp, Sandeep Kaushik, Florian Wiesinger, & Tetsuro Sekine. (2018). Improving PET/MR brain quantitation with template-enhanced ZTE. NeuroImage. 181. 403–413. 23 indexed citations

Lowe, Val J., Emily S. Lundt, David S. Knopman, et al.. (2017). Comparison of [18F]Flutemetamol and [11C]Pittsburgh Compound-B in cognitively normal young, cognitively normal elderly, and Alzheimer's disease dementia individuals. NeuroImage Clinical. 16. 295–302. 31 indexed citations

Jiang, Huailei, Aditya Bansal, Mukesh K. Pandey, et al.. (2017). Safety, pharmacokinetics, metabolism and radiation dosimetry of 18F-tetrafluoroborate (18F-TFB) in healthy human subjects. EJNMMI Research. 7(1). 90–90. 24 indexed citations

10.

Cao, Yanli, et al.. (2017). Free fatty acid flux measured using [1-¹¹C]palmitate positron emission tomography and [U-¹³C]palmitate in humans. American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism. 314(5). E413–E417. 5 indexed citations

11.

Schwarz, Christopher G., Matthew L. Senjem, Jeffrey L. Gunter, et al.. (2016). Optimizing PiB-PET SUVR change-over-time measurement by a large-scale analysis of longitudinal reliability, plausibility, separability, and correlation with MMSE. NeuroImage. 144(Pt A). 113–127. 62 indexed citations

12.

Aggarwal, Niti R., et al.. (2015). Feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of exercise treadmill nitrogen-13 ammonia PET myocardial perfusion imaging of obese patients. Journal of Nuclear Cardiology. 22(6). 1273–1280. 12 indexed citations

13.

Johnson, Geoffrey B., Patrick J. Peller, Bradley J. Kemp, & Jay H. Ryu. (2015). Future of Thoracic PET Scanning. CHEST Journal. 147(1). 25–30. 3 indexed citations

14.

Tabibian, James H., Slobodan Macura, Steven P. O’Hara, et al.. (2013). Micro-computed tomography and nuclear magnetic resonance imaging for noninvasive, live-mouse cholangiography. Laboratory Investigation. 93(6). 733–743. 25 indexed citations

15.

Lowe, Val J., et al.. (2012). A Pilot Study Comparing FLT-PET and FDG-PET in the Evaluation of Response to Cetuximab and Radiation Therapy in Advanced Head and Neck Malignancies. Journal of Nuclear Medicine & Radiation Therapy. 3(1). 2 indexed citations

16.

Jack, Clifford R., Val J. Lowe, Stephen D. Weigand, et al.. (2009). Serial PIB and MRI in normal, mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: implications for sequence of pathological events in Alzheimer's disease. Brain. 132(5). 1355–1365. 826 indexed citations breakdown →

17.

Lowe, Val J., Bradley J. Kemp, Clifford R. Jack, et al.. (2009). Comparison of ¹⁸F-FDG and PiB PET in Cognitive Impairment. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 50(6). 878–886. 154 indexed citations

18.

Doyle, B., Bradley J. Kemp, Panithaya Chareonthaitawee, et al.. (2007). Dynamic Tracking During Intracoronary Injection of 18F-FDG-Labeled Progenitor Cell Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 48(10). 1708–1714. 103 indexed citations

19.

Carlson, Stephanie K., Kelly Classic, Elizabeth M. Hadac, et al.. (2006). In Vivo Quantitation of Intratumoral Radioisotope Uptake Using Micro-Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography. Molecular Imaging and Biology. 8(6). 324–332. 45 indexed citations

20.

Pavitt, Charles & Bradley J. Kemp. (1999). Contextual and relational factors in interpersonal negotiation strategy choice. Communication Quarterly. 47(2). 133–150. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact