Claudio Bezerra-Santos
- Plant Science
- Pharmacology top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Food Science top 10%
- Pharmacology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Márcia Regina PiuvezamTheresa RamalhoJosé Maria Barbosa‐FilhoMarco A. MartinsChristianne Bandeira‐MeloAdriana Vieira‐de‐AbreuPatrı́cia T. BozzaL M Peçanha
- Topics
- Berberine and alkaloids research (5 papers)Piperaceae Chemical and Biological Studies (3 papers)Dermatology and Skin Diseases (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- BrazilUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Claudio Bezerra-Santos
13 papers receiving 320 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Plant Science 123
- Pharmacology 96
- Molecular Biology 78
- Food Science 77
- Pharmacology 61
Countries citing papers authored by Claudio Bezerra-Santos
This map shows the geographic impact of Claudio Bezerra-Santos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Claudio Bezerra-Santos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Claudio Bezerra-Santos more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Claudio Bezerra-Santos
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Claudio Bezerra-Santos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Claudio Bezerra-Santos. The network helps show where Claudio Bezerra-Santos may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Claudio Bezerra-Santos
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Claudio Bezerra-Santos. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Claudio Bezerra-Santos based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Claudio Bezerra-Santos. Claudio Bezerra-Santos is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 23 | |
| 5 | 94 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 35 | |
| 8 | 19 | |
| 9 | 39 | |
| 10 | 44 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | Amburana cearensis e Cumarina imunomodulam os níveis de anticorpos antígeno-específico em camundongos BALB/c sensibilizados com ovalbumina | 6 |
| 13 | 27 |
About Claudio Bezerra-Santos
Claudio Bezerra-Santos is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Sensory Systems and Pharmacology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 325 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Berberine and alkaloids research (5 papers), Piperaceae Chemical and Biological Studies (3 papers) and Dermatology and Skin Diseases (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (61 citations), Drug Discovery (1 citation) and Immunology and Allergy (35 citations). Claudio Bezerra-Santos has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Márcia Regina Piuvezam, Theresa Ramalho, José Maria Barbosa‐Filho, Marco A. Martins, Christianne Bandeira‐Melo, Adriana Vieira‐de‐Abreu, Patrı́cia T. Bozza, L M Peçanha, Giciane Carvalho Vieira and Bartira Rossi‐Bergmann. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Ethnopharmacology, Phytotherapy Research and International Immunopharmacology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.