Claudia Orange
6 papers receiving 234 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Health 69
- Geography, Planning and Development 24
- Public Administration 14
- Sociology and Political Science 113
- Demography 23
Countries citing papers authored by Claudia Orange
This map shows the geographic impact of Claudia Orange's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Claudia Orange with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Claudia Orange more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Claudia Orange
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Claudia Orange. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Claudia Orange. The network helps show where Claudia Orange may publish in the future.
No co-authors to show.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 164 | |
| 2 | 2004 | 77 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 25 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 17 | |
| 5 | Oral history in New Zealand | 1988 | 6 |
| 6 | 2023 | 3 |
About Claudia Orange
Claudia Orange is a scholar working on History, Infectious Diseases, Organic Chemistry, Surgery and Communication, having authored 6 papers that have together received 292 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Oral History, Memory, Narrative Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health (69 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (24 citations), Public Administration (14 citations), Sociology and Political Science (113 citations) and Demography (23 citations). Their work appears in journals such as Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.