Cláudia Hara
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Pharmacology top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Neurology
- Co-authors
- Fábio Lopes RochaCíntia FuzikawaMaria Fernanda Lima‐CostaRachel RieraNoriyoshi OgawaE. CostaMarta Miriam Lopes CostaFernando Rocha
- Topics
- Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (6 papers)Treatment of Major Depression (6 papers)Sleep and related disorders (4 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of Affective DisordersSLEEP
- Partner nations
- BrazilUnited KingdomJapan
In The Last Decade
Cláudia Hara
26 papers receiving 459 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Psychiatry and Mental health 180
- Pharmacology 146
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 140
- Cognitive Neuroscience 99
- Neurology 63
Countries citing papers authored by Cláudia Hara
This map shows the geographic impact of Cláudia Hara's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cláudia Hara with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cláudia Hara more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cláudia Hara
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cláudia Hara. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cláudia Hara. The network helps show where Cláudia Hara may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cláudia Hara
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cláudia Hara. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cláudia Hara based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cláudia Hara. Cláudia Hara is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 25 | |
| 6 | 50 | |
| 7 | 19 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 18 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 44 | |
| 13 | 18 | |
| 14 | 38 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 22 | |
| 17 | 37 | |
| 18 | 79 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | INTERACOES MEDICAMENTOSAS : ANTIDEPRESSIVOS NOVOS E O SISTEMA CITOCROMO P450 | 2 |
About Cláudia Hara
Cláudia Hara is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Biological Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 27 papers that have together received 481 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (6 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (6 papers) and Sleep and related disorders (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (60 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (180 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (140 citations). Cláudia Hara has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Fábio Lopes Rocha, Cíntia Fuzikawa, Maria Fernanda Lima‐Costa, Rachel Riera, Noriyoshi Ogawa, E. Costa, Marta Miriam Lopes Costa, Fernando Rocha, Izabela Guimarães Barbosa and Leandro Fernandes Malloy‐Diniz. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Affective Disorders and SLEEP.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.