Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A review of fuzzy AHP methods for decision-making with subjective judgements
2020655 citationsClaudia Eckert, Christopher Earl et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Earl
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Earl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Earl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Earl more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Earl
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Earl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Earl. The network helps show where Christopher Earl may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christopher Earl
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christopher Earl.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christopher Earl based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Christopher Earl. Christopher Earl is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Eckert, Claudia, et al.. (2015). HIGHLIGHTING THE IMPORTANCE OF TESTING IN THE PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. University of Huddersfield Repository (University of Huddersfield). 21–30.5 indexed citations
6.
Eckert, Claudia, Martin Stacey, & Christopher Earl. (2013). Formality in design communication. Artificial intelligence for engineering design analysis and manufacturing. 27(2). 91–103.10 indexed citations
7.
Eckert, Claudia, Alan F. Blackwell, Martin Stacey, Christopher Earl, & Luke Church. (2012). Sketching across design domains: Roles and formalities. Artificial intelligence for engineering design analysis and manufacturing. 26(3). 245–266.22 indexed citations
8.
Eckert, Claudia, Ola Isaksson, & Christopher Earl. (2012). Product property margins: an underlying critical problem of engineering design. Open Research Online (The Open University).7 indexed citations
Jowers, Iestyn & Christopher Earl. (2011). Implementation of Curved Shape Grammars. Environment and Planning B Planning and Design. 38(4). 616–635.26 indexed citations
11.
McKay, Alison, Scott Chase, Iestyn Jowers, et al.. (2009). Designing for the 21st century: interdisciplinary methods and findings.6 indexed citations
12.
Jowers, Iestyn & Christopher Earl. (2009). The Construction of Curved Shapes. Environment and Planning B Planning and Design. 37(1). 42–58.16 indexed citations
13.
Earl, Christopher, et al.. (2007). Multimodality through physical digital design. Open Research Online (The Open University).1 indexed citations
Eckert, Claudia, Christopher Earl, Martin Stacey, Louis L. Bucciarelli, & P. John Clarkson. (2005). RISK ACROSS DESIGN DOMAINS. Open Research Online (The Open University). 2235.3 indexed citations
16.
Eckert, Claudia, Martin Stacey, & Christopher Earl. (2005). REFERENCES TO PAST DESIGNS. DMU Open Research Archive (De Montfort University).32 indexed citations
17.
Eckert, Claudia, et al.. (2004). Sketching across design domains. Open Research Online (The Open University).8 indexed citations
18.
Eckert, Claudia, Martin Stacey, & Christopher Earl. (2003). AMBIGUITY IS A DOUBLE-EDGED SWORD: SIMILARITY REFERENCES IN COMMUNICATION. Open Research Online (The Open University).8 indexed citations
19.
Stacey, Martin, et al.. (2003). A METHODOLOGY FOR COMPARING DESIGN PROCESSES. Open Research Online (The Open University).5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.