Claudia Asenjo‐Lobos
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 1%
- Physiology
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Pharmacology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Stefan LeuchtKatja KomossaSandra SchwarzChristine Rummel‐KlugeFranziska SchmidHeike HungerJohn M. DavisWerner Kissling
- Topics
- Schizophrenia research and treatment (8 papers)Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (6 papers)Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (6 papers)
In The Last Decade
Claudia Asenjo‐Lobos
21 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
- Psychiatry and Mental health 820
- Physiology 181
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 165
- Clinical Psychology 151
- Pharmacology 147
Countries citing papers authored by Claudia Asenjo‐Lobos
This map shows the geographic impact of Claudia Asenjo‐Lobos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Claudia Asenjo‐Lobos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Claudia Asenjo‐Lobos more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Claudia Asenjo‐Lobos
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Claudia Asenjo‐Lobos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Claudia Asenjo‐Lobos. The network helps show where Claudia Asenjo‐Lobos may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Claudia Asenjo‐Lobos
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Claudia Asenjo‐Lobos. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Claudia Asenjo‐Lobos based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Claudia Asenjo‐Lobos. Claudia Asenjo‐Lobos is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 32 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | Hierarchy of evidence. Levels of evidence and grades of recommendation from current use [Jerarquización de la evidencia. Niveles de evidencia y grados de recomendación de uso actual] | 3 |
| 13 | 66 | |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | 23 | |
| 16 | 22 | |
| 17 | Head-to-head comparisons of metabolic side effects of second generation antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta-analysisbreakdown → | 513 |
| 18 | 45 | |
| 19 | 146 | |
| 20 | 361 |
About Claudia Asenjo‐Lobos
Claudia Asenjo‐Lobos is a scholar working on General Dentistry, Psychiatry and Mental health and Family Practice, having authored 24 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (8 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (6 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (820 citations), Biological Psychiatry (94 citations) and Philosophy (134 citations). Claudia Asenjo‐Lobos has collaborated with scholars based in Chile, Spain and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Stefan Leucht, Katja Komossa, Sandra Schwarz, Christine Rummel‐Kluge, Franziska Schmid, Heike Hunger, John M. Davis, Werner Kissling, Caroline Corves and Carlos Manterola. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, American Journal of Psychiatry and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.